Laps and Shift Function: Understanding the Role of t^a in Wald's GR Book (p.255)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paweld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Shift
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the interpretation of the vector field t^a as presented in Wald's General Relativity book (p.255). It establishes that the condition t^a \nabla_a t = 1 indicates that t^a is properly normalized, allowing the time function t to change at a constant rate along its integral curves. The distinction between g^{ab}\nabla_b t and t^a is highlighted, with the former not satisfying the normalization condition, thus failing to represent a proper time flow. This understanding is crucial for comprehending the dynamics of time in the context of General Relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with the concepts of Lie derivatives
  • Knowledge of the normalization conditions in General Relativity
  • Basic grasp of the Cauchy surfaces in spacetime
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie derivatives in the context of General Relativity
  • Explore the implications of normalization conditions on vector fields
  • Investigate the role of Cauchy surfaces in the evolution of spacetime
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of time functions in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students studying General Relativity, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of time and vector fields in spacetime.

paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
Could anyone explain me what is the interpretation of t^a filed in
Wald's GR book (p.255). It's defined as any (?) field which
fulfills condition [tex]t^a \nabla_a t[/tex], where t is "time function".
What is the difference between [tex]g^{ab}\nabla_b t[/tex]
and t^a. Thanks for answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Another way of stating [tex]t^a\nabla_a t=1[/tex] is that the Lie derivative of [tex]t[/tex] along [tex]t^a[/tex] equals 1. So Wald is just saying that the vector field [tex]t^a[/tex] is properly normalized so that the function [tex]t[/tex] changes at a constant rate of 1 along its integral curves. This normalization would be impossible to achieve if, for example, [tex]t^a[/tex] were parallel to the Cauchy surfaces, as [tex]t[/tex] would not change at all along its integral curves. The condition [tex]t^a\nabla_a t=1[/tex] makes sure that [tex]t^a[/tex] is properly normalized as to generate time flow.

[tex]g^{ab}\nabla_b t[/tex] is just equal to [tex]\nabla^at[/tex]. This doesn't satisfy the above condition, since [tex]\nabla^at\nabla_a t\not=1[/tex] (not necessarily, at least).

Cheers,
Matthew
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
18K