Latent Heat: An Alternative Explanation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of latent heat, specifically an alternative explanation for the temperature increase observed during the condensation of humid air. Participants explore the implications of this phenomenon, questioning established interpretations and proposing new models.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the temperature increase during condensation is a statistical anomaly rather than a result of energy release from water vapor molecules.
  • This participant proposes that the condensation process selectively removes the least energetic (coolest) molecules, leading to an increase in the mean temperature of the remaining molecules.
  • Another participant challenges this view, arguing that the observations of energy release during condensation are well-documented and contradict the initial claim of no observable energy transfer.
  • The same participant cites personal experiences with steam burns as evidence of energy release, asserting that such phenomena cannot be explained by the proposed statistical anomaly.
  • There is a mention of common experimental methods, such as differential scanning calorimetry, that measure temperature and energy changes during phase transitions, countering the claim of unobserved energy release.
  • A later reply acknowledges a violation of forum rules regarding speculation, indicating a recognition of the contentious nature of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the nature of energy transfer during condensation, with one side proposing an alternative explanation and the other affirming established observations. The discussion remains unresolved, with competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific studies and personal experiences, but the validity of the claims made by participants is not established, leaving room for further exploration and debate.

klimatos
Messages
411
Reaction score
36
1. In studies of the heat budget of the global free atmosphere, the concept of “latent heat” (now known as “enthalpy of condensation”) plays an important role[1].

2. Both observation and experiment confirm that when humid air condenses the temperature of the remaining air increases[2].

3. This temperature increase is believed to be caused by the release of energy by the water vapor molecules during the condensation process and its contemporaneous absorption by the remaining humid air[3].

4. Yet, to the best of my admittedly limited knowledge, no such release has ever been actually observed!

5. I suggest that the reason for this lack of observation is because no such energy as described in (3) exists. The very real temperature increase described in (2) is a simple statistical anomaly.

6. When condensation occurs, I maintain that the condensation process is selective. That is, the least energetic molecules are the most likely to be attracted to the hygroscopic condensation nuclei or to the hygroscopic proto-droplet. These least energetic molecules are, by the definition of temperature, the coolest molecules.

7. By selectively removing the coolest molecules, the mean temperature of the remaining molecules increases.

8. Let me offer an analogy. Imagine a large room containing a considerable number of people. Each individual has a certain amount of money on their person. The total amount of money in the room is analogous to the enthalpy content of a mass of humid air. The average amount per person is analogous to the temperature of our mass of humid air. We request that every individual with less than a certain amount of money step out of the room and into the lobby (analogous to condensation). After they leave, the total amount of money in the room is diminished, but the average has gone up.

9. So it is with condensation. You remove heat and the temperature goes up. A rather nice paradox. [1] Kiehl, J. T. and Trenberth, K. E., 1997: “Earth’s Annual Global Mean Energy Budget”, Bulletin of the American Meteorology Society, Vol. 78, No. 2, February 1997.
[2] R. R. Rogers and M. K. Yau, A Short Course in Cloud Physics, Butterworth & Heinemann, 1988.
[3] Ibid.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Is this new? How is this different than the Maxwell Demon?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and anorlunda
klimatos said:
2. Both observation and experiment confirm that when humid air condenses the temperature of the remaining air increases[2].
...
4. Yet, to the best of my admittedly limited knowledge, no such release has ever been actually observed!
Your 2 contradicts your 4. The experiments mentioned in 2 are the observation of energy release. Every person who has been treated for burns from steam can also attest to having observed this quite viscerally. Second degree steam burns are simply not explainable by statistically “cold” molecules preferentially sticking to skin with no energy transfer. Also temperature and energy of phase changes are directly measured with common devices like differential scanning calorimeters. Far from being unobserved, this is routinely observed with relatively inexpensive precision equipment.

The entire rest of your post is based on a completely false premise.

Additionally, I remind you of the forum rules and recommend that you check them before further posting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Yuriy Verkhatsky, sophiecentaur and russ_watters
Dale said:
Additionally, I remind you of the forum rules and recommend that you check them before further posting.
I have reread the forum rules and concede that I am in violation of them in posting a speculation. My apologies to all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur, berkeman, anorlunda and 1 other person
Thank you for checking @klimatos

I will go ahead and close this thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K