Launch of a rocket - its initial displacement and velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the initial conditions for modeling rocket motion, specifically addressing whether the initial velocity can be assumed to be zero. Participants confirm that for rockets launched from a fixed or mobile tower, the initial velocity relative to the launch site is indeed zero. They explain that upon ignition and release from clamps, the rocket accelerates under thrust and aerodynamic forces. Additionally, the conversation highlights various launch mechanisms, including those for smaller rockets and missiles, emphasizing the importance of understanding model rocketry for practical insights into rocket dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics and dynamics
  • Familiarity with rocket propulsion principles
  • Knowledge of launch mechanisms and their engineering constraints
  • Experience with model rocketry and its associated mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the physics of rocket propulsion and thrust-to-weight ratio
  • Learn about the dynamics of rocket flight using Estes model rocket engine charts
  • Investigate the effects of center of gravity and aerodynamics on rocket stability
  • Study the differences between various rocket launch systems, including ground and airborne launches
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, hobbyists in model rocketry, and anyone interested in the principles of rocket dynamics and launch mechanisms.

Saba
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
The process of launching the rocket got a bit confusing for me. The rocket launcher won't work when the rocket is still on the ground is that right? Therefore a rocket needs an external force at the start to shoot the rocket a few meters up, and then that's when the main thrust engine starts working?
so then when we model the velocity of the motion of a rocket (e.g., in a mathematics report), is it reasonable to assume that the initial velocity equals zero? I also apologise for my lack of information if I made a huge mistake in my question 🙏🏻
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rocket motor works perfectly fine while the rocket is on the ground. Nothing else is needed to launch the rocket. Note that the rocket engine is always above the ground or launch pad anyways, as you wouldn't want to block the exhaust nozzle, so there's no difference between the engine firing while the rocket sits on the ground vs while it is a few meters off of the ground.

Saba said:
so then when we model the velocity of the motion of a rocket (e.g., in a mathematics report), is it reasonable to assume that the initial velocity equals zero?
Yes, the initial velocity is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saba
Yes, setting the initial velocity of the rocket relative to the launch site as zero is more or less the only natural choice when modelling a rocket launch from the start: Initial position = launch tower, initial velocity (relative to launch tower) = 0.

Pretty much all rocket systems launched from the ground using a fixed or mobile tower will have the rocket clamped to the tower, possibly with the engine nozzles pointing into a big flame trench for big rockets, and after a valid ignition has been confirmed (e.g. all engines running nominally) the clamps release the rockets which is then free to accelerate upwards. As a force model this means at launch (i.e. at the instant the clamps release) the rocket can be modelled as a freely moving body under the influence of a thrust force (and quickly after launch also aerodynamic forces).
Other launch system, notably submarine launchers and some man-carried missile launchers, have a launch phase where the rocket is first ejected into "free air" before the (single) main engine kicks in.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Saba
Saba said:
The rocket launcher won't work when the rocket is still on the ground is that right?
No, who told you that?

Saba said:
Therefore a rocket needs an external force at the start to shoot the rocket a few meters up, and then that's when the main thrust engine starts working?
Are you maybe talking about missiles lunched from tubes/silos? Their main rocket engine often starts with a delay, after being shot out by other means. But that is just to protect the launcher from the rocket exhaust.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saba
This sounds more like an engineering question. I would think the launch parameters and constraints for a real rocket are not inherent in basic kinematics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saba
Filip Larsen said:
Pretty much all rocket systems launched from the ground using a fixed or mobile tower will have the rocket clamped to the tower, possibly with the engine nozzles pointing into a big flame trench for big rockets, and after a valid ignition has been confirmed (e.g. all engines running nominally) the clamps release the rockets which is then free to accelerate upwards.
This is true for large orbital launch vehicles, but for smaller rockets like sounding rockets and missiles, it's far more typical for the rocket to just be on a guide rail or in a tube and for motion to start as soon as thrust exceeds weight. The ignition transient of a modern solid rocket motor is fast enough for this to not be an issue though, as you typically achieve full design thrust in a few dozen to hundred milliseconds, depending on motor size.

It is also true that some systems kick the rocket out before igniting the main motor, but that's more because of specific engineering design decisions or usage constraints, not because there's physically any reason you couldn't light the main motor immediately. The Javelin anti-tank missile (as you said) is a good example of this - it gets kicked several meters out in front of the launcher before the main engine ignites, but that's more so the main engine isn't firing as it's leaving a tube right in front of the operator, since that would be hazardous to the person using the missile.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
cjl said:
This is true for large orbital launch vehicles, but for smaller rockets like sounding rockets and missiles, it's far more typical for the rocket to just be on a guide rail or in a tube and for motion to start as soon as thrust exceeds weight.
Indeed. I was mainly trying to give the OP some background knowledge by sampling a few of the many different launch mechanisms that are in practical use, since the question was about reasonable initial conditions.

Vertically launched sounding rockets are interesting in that they are very close realizations of the simplest possible one-dimensional mathematical rocket models that students might encounter as math problems initially. Having said that I better for the benefit of the OP also add that the OP problem is it more about math than about providing a realistic model for rocket kinematics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cjl
If you want to know how rockets work...get into model rocketry....actually buiding model rockets, you really start to understand all the equations and mathamatics that goes into the flight of a rocket. check out Estes model rocket engine charts and begine from there. when you build a rocket...center of gravity and center of the rockets aerodynamics are important to know....like a rocket rolls in flight because of lift....cool things like that you learn!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
ebg said:
If you want to know how rockets work...get into model rocketry....actually buiding model rockets, you really start to understand all the equations and mathamatics that goes into the flight of a rocket. check out Estes model rocket engine charts and begine from there. when you build a rocket...center of gravity and center of the rockets aerodynamics are important to know....like a rocket rolls in flight because of lift....cool things like that you learn!
:welcome:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ebg

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
751
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K