Laurent series for pole to non integer power

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of an integral involving a Schwarz-Christoffel transformation, specifically focusing on the extraction of residues from poles raised to non-integer powers. Participants explore the implications of non-integer powers on the analyticity of the function and the challenges posed by branch cuts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an integral with two poles at -2.9 and 0.5, questioning how to find the residue when the poles are raised to non-integer powers.
  • Another participant asserts that non-integer powers introduce branch cuts, which disrupt the continuity of the function around the poles, suggesting that the function is not holomorphic and thus lacks poles.
  • A subsequent participant expresses disappointment at the implication that analytical calculation may not be possible due to the branch cuts.
  • Another participant suggests that the hypergeometric function could be a viable approach to tackle the problem.
  • A later reply provides an antiderivative derived from Mathematica, highlighting the complexity introduced by multifunctions and the necessity for analytic extensions when evaluating the integral across different points.
  • This participant notes that the multivalued nature of the antiderivative implies that the final answer could also be multivalued, especially if the exponents are irrational, indicating a potentially infinite number of values.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of non-integer powers on the analyticity of the function. There is no consensus on whether the integral can be calculated analytically due to the complications introduced by branch cuts and multifunctions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the continuity of the function around the poles and the challenges of working with multivalued functions, particularly in the context of analytic extensions.

meldraft
Messages
280
Reaction score
2
Hey all,

I am doing a Schwarz-Christoffel transformation and I am trying to calculate the integral analytically using the residue theorem.

My integral is the following:

[tex]\int^\zeta _{\zeta_0} (z+1)\frac{1}{(z+2.9)^{{b_1}/\pi}{(z-0.5)^{{b_2}/\pi}}}dz[/tex]

This has two poles at -2.9 and 0.5. [itex]b_1[/itex] and [itex]b_2[/itex] are not integers.

I want to do this integral for a contour that contains both poles. I know how to use the Laurent series to extract the [itex]a_{-1}[/itex] term (residue) needed for the residue theorem for integer powers (which is to take the limit of the derivative of the same power). Does anyone know how I can find the residue for a function where the poles are raised to a non-integer power?

Cheers

P.S. Lately my fraction lines appear in the web browser distorted, anyone knows what's up with that??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you've got non-integer powers in the denominator, it means you have branch cuts, hence your function is not continuous around z=-2.9 and z=0.5, hence not holomorphic, hence no poles.
 
Awww that sucks :cry: Is there no way to calculate this analytically?
 
With the hypergeometric function you can.
 
Ok, that's interesting. Here's the antiderivative via Mathematica where I use just 2 and not 2.9 and the exponents are b and c:

[tex] \begin{multline}\frac{1}{2 (-b+\pi )}\left(-\frac{1}{2}+z\right)^{-\frac{c}{\pi }} (2+z)^{-\frac{b}{\pi }} \left((-b+\pi ) (1-2 z)^{c/\pi } \left(1+\frac{z}{2}\right)^{b/\pi } z^2 \text{AppellF1}\left[2,\frac{c}{\pi },\frac{b}{\pi },3,2 z,-\frac{z}{2}\right]\\<br /> +2 \pi \left(\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2 z}{5}\right)^{c/\pi } (2+z) \text{Hypergeometric2F1}\left[\frac{c}{\pi },\frac{-b+\pi }{\pi },1+\frac{-b+\pi }{\pi },\frac{2 (2+z)}{5}\right]\right)<br /> \end{multline}[/tex]

Ok, that antiderivative, call it [itex]M(x)[/itex] is full of multifunctions and in order to evaluate:

[tex]M(z)\biggr|_{z_1}^{z^2}[/tex]

you would have to take analytic extensions over each multifunction between the points z_1 and z_2. That's quite a challenge I think which means in order to do this one, you'd best work on some simpler ones where you have to analytically extend the antiderivative. Also, since the antiderivative is multivalued, so too will be the answer, one value for each sheet of each function you integrate over and if the exponents are irrational, the answer is infinitely-valued.

All in all, a nice problem to work on. Probably take me the entire semester. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K