Confused about Laurent series of analytic functions

In summary, Laurent series can be found by manipulating the expression to look like a geometric series and then using the coefficients of the geometric series to find the Laurent series. It is important to pay attention to the region of convergence when finding the Laurent series. If the numerator contains a function with no poles, it can be expanded separately and then multiplied by the Laurent series of the original function to get the product of two series.
  • #1
spacelike
37
0
I am a bit confused about laurent series. I know the definitions where the coefficients are expressed as integrals.

However, I am confused about how to actually find the laurent series in practice, for analytic functions.
The information I can find online is just terrible, some of them do solve them but they don't use integration at all, they all seem to have some different but similar tricks to find the series and none of them actually explain the steps.

For example a problem I am looking at says to find all taylor and Laurent expansion about the origin, of the function:
[tex]\frac{1}{z^{2}+1}[/tex]
There are two poles at [itex]z=\pm i[/itex]

So by my limited understanding of how to expand this function, I think the idea is to just do a taylor series about z=0, which is only valid in the region |z|<1

Then I think the next step is to do a Laurent series which is valid in the region |z|>1
but I am unsure how to do this.
Some sources I found seem to suggest expanding about the poles but which one do I pick?Just to be clear I am not really asking for a solution to the function I posed above, what I would like is an understanding of how to find laurent expansions of functions such as the one I wrote above. Nothing too complicated, this doesn't seem like too complex of a subject, but I just can't find any decent coherent source explaining how to perform the expansion online.

So thank you for any help or general advice on performing laurent expansions you can give me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ok, so you understand how to compute the series about a region where the function is analytic right? The series is just a Taylor series and an easy way to do that as well a lot of other ones is to manipulate the expression so that it looks like a geometric series which you already know what the form is right? So:

[tex]\frac{1}{1+z^2}=\frac{1}{1-(-z^2)}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n z^{2n},\quad |z|<1[/tex]

Now when you're expanding within an annular region bordered by poles, you will always obtain a series which has an essential singularity at the borders. That means of course, you'll get an expression with z's always on the bottom but again, manipulate the expression so that it looks like a geometric series so:

[tex]\frac{1}{1+z^2}=\frac{a}{z+i}+\frac{b}{z+i}[/tex]

I'll do one and see if you can do the other:

[tex]\frac{a}{z+i}=\frac{a}{z(1+i/z)}=\frac{a}{z}\frac{1}{1-(-i/z)}=a/z\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n\left(\frac{i}{z}\right)^n,\quad |z|>1[/tex]

Also, get a good book on Complex Analysis like "Basic Complex Analysis" by Marsden and Hoffman then work towards deriving a general expression for expressing the Laurent series in the respective annular regions between poles of the expression:

[tex]\frac{1}{P_n(z)}[/tex]

where P_n(z) is a polynomial, that is derive the expression:

[tex]\frac{1}{P_n(z)}=\text{my series in my annular region} [/tex]

for any polynomial what so ever.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Did you mean the following?
[tex]\frac{1}{1+z^{2}}=\frac{a}{z+i}+\frac{b}{z-i}[/tex]
You had a + instead of a - in the denominator for b.

Then the other one would be:
[tex]\frac{b}{z-i}=\frac{b}{z(1-i/z)}=\frac{b}{z}\frac{1}{1-(i/z)}=\frac{a}{z}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\left( \frac{i}{z}\right)^{n}, |z|>1[/tex]

Also I solved for:
[tex]a=\frac{i}{2}, b=\frac{-i}{2}[/tex]

Thanks it's starting to make sense now. So I guess I just plug in the a and b values and add the two series together and that is equal to the Laurent expansion in the annular region then?Also, one other question, sorry if this is an obvious question, but why is it that in the |z|<1 region we do a geometric series for:
[tex]\frac{1}{1-(-z^{2})}[/tex]
and in the annular region we do a geometric series for:
[tex]\frac{a}{z+i}+\frac{b}{z-i}[/tex]

how do you know using the second one will give you the answer you want in the annular region and not the first one?
 
  • #4
spacelike said:
Did you mean the following?
[tex]\frac{1}{1+z^{2}}=\frac{a}{z+i}+\frac{b}{z-i}[/tex]
You had a + instead of a - in the denominator for b.
Yes. Very good then.

Then the other one would be:
[tex]\frac{b}{z-i}=\frac{b}{z(1-i/z)}=\frac{b}{z}\frac{1}{1-(i/z)}=\frac{a}{z}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\left( \frac{i}{z}\right)^{n}, |z|>1[/tex]
Need b in that one.

So I guess I just plug in the a and b values and add the two series together and that is equal to the Laurent expansion in the annular region then?

Yes.

Also, one other question, sorry if this is an obvious question, but why is it that in the |z|<1 region we do a geometric series for:
[tex]\frac{1}{1-(-z^{2})}[/tex]
and in the annular region we do a geometric series for:
[tex]\frac{a}{z+i}+\frac{b}{z-i}[/tex]

how do you know using the second one will give you the answer you want in the annular region and not the first one?


Because the geometric series converges for |z|<1 so in the first case if |z|<1, we can just use it as is and represent it in terms of a geometric series for the variable z^2. Howeer, for the second case, we need to force-fit the quotient expressions to contain terms usually z/k or k/z such that when |z| is in the annular region, then the absolute value of z/k or k/z are less than one and then we can express the quotient in terms of the geometric series for the variable z/k or k/z..
 
  • #5
Perfect, that is all very clear now.

I just have one last question if you don't mind.

Say I did a similar problem but instead of 1 in the numerator there was some function f(z) which has no poles.
So:
[tex]\frac{f(x)}{1+z^{2}}[/tex]

Could I just take off the f(z) and expand the same function we just did with the 1 in the numerator,
[tex]\frac{1}{1+z^{2}}[/tex]

and then separately expand f(z) (which has no poles) in a taylor expansion for example?
and then just multiply the two series? So I would end up with the product of two sums?

Does that sound right, or do I have to completely modify the method you have outlined here if there exists an f(z) instead of a 1 in the numerator?

I mean, I know that doing the product of two series would be equal to the original function, but what I'm asking is would it be considered as a "laurent expansion" of the function?
 
  • #6
spacelike said:
Perfect, that is all very clear now.

I just have one last question if you don't mind.

Say I did a similar problem but instead of 1 in the numerator there was some function f(z) which has no poles.
So:
[tex]\frac{f(x)}{1+z^{2}}[/tex]

Could I just take off the f(z) and expand the same function we just did with the 1 in the numerator,
[tex]\frac{1}{1+z^{2}}[/tex]

and then separately expand f(z) (which has no poles) in a taylor expansion for example?
and then just multiply the two series? So I would end up with the product of two sums?

That is correct although there may be easier ways of computing the Laurent series than computing the product of two series.
 

1. What is a Laurent series?

A Laurent series is a type of power series expansion that represents a complex-valued analytic function in a region that includes an annulus surrounding a point. It is a combination of positive and negative powers of the variable, making it more general than a Taylor series.

2. How is a Laurent series different from a Taylor series?

A Taylor series only contains non-negative powers of the variable, whereas a Laurent series includes both positive and negative powers. This allows the Laurent series to represent functions with singularities or poles, while a Taylor series is only valid for functions that are analytic in a given region.

3. What is the significance of the principal part in a Laurent series?

The principal part in a Laurent series is the part of the series that contains the negative powers of the variable. It represents the singular behavior of the function at points where it is not analytic. The principal part is important because it allows us to analyze the behavior of the function near these singular points.

4. How do you determine the coefficients in a Laurent series?

The coefficients in a Laurent series can be determined using the formula:
cn = (1/2πi) ∮ f(z)(z-a)-n-1 dz,
where a is the center of the series and the integral is taken over a closed contour surrounding a. This formula can be derived using Cauchy's integral formula.

5. When can a function be represented by a Laurent series?

A function can be represented by a Laurent series if it is analytic in a region that includes an annulus surrounding a point. This means that the function must be continuous and have derivatives of all orders in that region. Additionally, the function must have no singularities within the annulus.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
908
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
784
Back
Top