Learning Physics Basics: Feynman vs Serway

  • Thread starter Thread starter welatiger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feynman
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the suitability of Richard Feynman's "Lectures on Physics" versus Raymond A. Serway's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" for beginners in physics. Participants recommend Feynman's lectures for those with a foundational understanding of calculus and differential equations, while cautioning that they are not comprehensive enough to serve as the sole resource. Serway's text is suggested as a more detailed alternative for beginners focusing on specific areas such as mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic calculus knowledge
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with partial differential equations
  • Introduction to special functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Richard Feynman's "Lectures on Physics" for conceptual understanding
  • Study Raymond A. Serway's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" for detailed explanations
  • Research basic mechanics to build a strong foundation in physics
  • Investigate supplementary resources that focus on specific physics topics
USEFUL FOR

Students beginning their journey in physics, educators seeking teaching materials, and anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of fundamental physics concepts.

welatiger
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Is Feynman lectures on physics suitable for beginning physics (learn basics of physics)
OR physics for scientists and engineers (Serway) ?
i want to learn basics most powerful
thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much mathematics do you know?
 
i know basic calculus and differential eqs
and partial DE
some special fns
and little functional analysis
 
In that case, I recommend Feynman.
 
thank you very much for your help
hoping other members to give me their opinions
 
Many people refer to the The Feynman lectures as "physics for physicists" and I think I have to agree. Reading the lectures is an excellent way of brushing up on a certain area or getting a different perspective but I wouldn't recommend it as your ONLY book.
Part of the problem is simply that they are too brief; the lectures are quite short meaning they cover an enormous amount of physics in each chapter, there is simply not enough space to go into any details; most books on e.g. basic E&M are longer than one volume of the lectures.

My advice would to initially focus on one (or maybe two) area of physics (say basic mechanics) and then buy a good book that cover ONLY that area.
 
Last edited:
Serway
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
491
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K