Legendre Transforms: U=U(S,V) vs U(V,P)

  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikuvol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Legendre
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of Legendre transforms in thermodynamics, specifically regarding the internal energy function U. While some texts define U as a function of entropy and volume (U=U(S,V)), others suggest it can also be expressed in terms of temperature and pressure (U=U(T,P)). The "natural" variables for internal energy are identified as entropy and volume due to fundamental thermodynamic laws. Legendre transformations allow for the definition of other thermodynamic potentials by changing the independent variables, such as transforming U into free energy by substituting entropy for temperature. The inquiry concludes with a question about the implications of defining U as a function of temperature and pressure.
matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
When people do Legendre transforms they suppose that U=U(S,V). But you can see in some books that heat is defined by:
dQ=(\frac{\partial U}{\partial P})_{V}dP+[(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V})_P+P]dV

So they supposed obviously that U=U(V,P).

In some books you can that internal energy is function of T,P, and in some books function of V,T. Why then in definition of Legendre transforms of thermodynamics potential we use U=U(S,V). Tnx for the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can, of course, express any thermodynamic potential by any pair of quantities you like, but there are "natural" ones. E.g. for the internal energy, U, the natural variables are S and V, because of the fundamental laws of thermodynamics:

\mathrm{d} U=T \mathrm{d} S-p \mathrm{d} V.

Now you can define other potentials to have other "natural" independent variables by Legendre transformations. E.g. the free energy trades S for T via:

F=U-T S.

Taking the total differential gives

\mathrm{d} F=\mathrm{d} U - T \mathrm{d} S-S \mathrm{d} T=-S \mathrm{d} T-p \mathrm{d} V,

etc.
 
Tnx. Do I get something with Legendre transforms if I defined
U=U(T,P)?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top