Legendre's Diff Eq using Frobenius

  • Thread starter Thread starter brew_guru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diff eq Frobenius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving Legendre polynomials using the Frobenius series solution to Legendre's differential equation. The formula for the Legendre polynomials is given as P_n(x) = ∑_{k=0}^{N} [(-1)^k(2n-k)! / (2^n k! (n-k)! (n-2k)!)] x^{n-2k}, with N defined as n/2 for even n and (n-1)/2 for odd n. Participants clarify the recursion relations for coefficients a_2 and a_3, and emphasize that the initial conditions do not restrict a_0 and a_1, allowing for a valid series expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Legendre's differential equation
  • Frobenius series method for solving differential equations
  • Basic combinatorial mathematics for factorial manipulation
  • Knowledge of series expansions and convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Legendre polynomials from first principles
  • Explore the application of the Frobenius method in other differential equations
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Legendre polynomials in physics
  • Investigate Taylor series expansions and their relation to Frobenius series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying differential equations, particularly those interested in special functions and their applications in mathematical physics.

brew_guru
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show, by direct examination of the Frobenius series solution to Legendre's differential equation that;
P_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{N} \frac{(-1)^k(2n-k)!} {2^n k! (n-k)! (n-2k)!}x^{n-2k} ;\ N=\frac{n}{2}\ \mathrm{n\ even,}\ <br /> N=\frac{n-1}{2}\ \mathrm{n\ odd}

Write down the first five Legendre polynomials due to this formula. Show also that P_n(1)=1 and P_n(-1)=(-1)^n

Homework Equations


The Frobenius/Puiseux/Fuchs series solution is: y= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n}x^{k+n}
Legendre's Diff Eq is: (1-x^{2})y&#039;&#039;-2xy&#039;+l(l+1)=0

The Attempt at a Solution


y= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n}x^{k+n}<br /> y&#039;= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (k+n)a_{n}x^{k+n-1}<br /> y&#039;&#039;= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (k+n)(k+n-1)a_{n}x^{k+n-2}
Setting the x^k power to zero yields:
a_2 = \frac{k(k+1)-l(l+1)}{(k+2)(k+1)} a_0
Setting the x^{k+1} power to zero yields:
a_3 = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)+l(l+1)}{(k+3)(k+2)}a_1
I believe setting the x^{k-2}\ \mathrm{and}\ x^{k-1} powers yield:
k(k-1)a_0 = 0<br /> k(k+1)a_1 = 0
although this would seem to imply my first two constants are zero, which would make all higher order constants zero as well since each constant can be written in terms of an earlier constant. This is the first part I am stuck on, and the second is getting an answer in terms of P_n(x) instead of y(x). Thank you for any direct help or links to reading material!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
brew_guru said:

Homework Statement



Show, by direct examination of the Frobenius series solution to Legendre's differential equation that;
P_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{N} \frac{(-1)^k(2n-k)!} {2^n k! (n-k)! (n-2k)!}x^{n-2k} N=\frac{n}{2}\ \mathrm{n\ even}<br /> N=\frac{n-1}{2}\ \mathrm{n\ odd}

Write down the first five Legendre polynomials due to this formula. Show also that P_n(1)=1 and P_n(-1)=(-1)^n

Homework Equations


The Frobenius/Puiseux/Fuchs series solution is: y= \sum_{n=0}^{\inf} a_{n}x^{k+n}
Legendre's Diff Eq is: (1-x^{2})y&#039;&#039;-2xy&#039;+l(l+1)=0

The Attempt at a Solution


y= \sum_{n=0}^{\inf} a_{n}x^{k+n}<br /> y&#039;= \sum_{n=0}^{\inf} (k+n)a_{n}x^{k+n-1}<br /> y&#039;&#039;= \sum_{n=0}^{\inf} (k+n)(k+n-1)a_{n}x^{k+n-2}
Setting the x^k power to zero yields:
a_2 = \frac{k(k+1)-l(l+1)}{(k+2)(k+1)} a_0
Setting the x^{k+1} power to zero yields:
a_3 = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)+l(l+1)}{(k+3)(k+2)}a_1
I believe setting the x^{k-2}\ \mathrm{and}\ x^{k-1} powers yield:
k(k-1)a_0 = 0<br /> k(k+1)a_1 = 0
although this would seem to imply my first two constants are zero, which would make all higher order constants zero as well since each constant can be written in terms of an earlier constant. This is the first part I am stuck on, and the second is getting an answer in terms of P_n(x) instead of y(x). Thank you for any direct help or links to reading material!

Use the forward slash to close tex tags. You should also preview your posts to confirm they are displaying correctly. I fixed your tags so your post is readable. I don't have time right now to look at it but at least now someone might read it.
 
Last edited:
Since you're expanding about x0=0, which isn't a singular point of the differential equation, you can expand the solution as a plain old Taylor series:
$$y = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n x^n$$You don't need to mess with the k+n nonsense. When you do this, you get the same recursion relation as before.

Note if you set k=0 in your work above, the conditions
\begin{align*}
k(k-1)a_0 &= 0 \\
k(k+1)a_1 &= 0
\end{align*} are satisfied automatically. There are no restrictions on a0 and a1.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K