- #1
anhtudo
- 2
- 2
- TL;DR Summary
- What I don't understand is how he proves that G = N.
I don't think it is logical to let b = n as it can not be derived from the definition of G that b is in G.
Thanks.
Lemma 1.2.3 is a mathematical statement that is used to prove a theorem in the book "The Real Numbers and Real Analysis" by Ethan.D.Bloch. It is a specific step or subproof that is essential in proving the main theorem.
Ethan.D.Bloch is a mathematician and author who has written several books on real analysis and other mathematical topics. His book "The Real Numbers and Real Analysis" is important because it provides a comprehensive and rigorous introduction to the concepts of real numbers and real analysis, which are essential for understanding advanced mathematics.
Real numbers are numbers that can be represented on a number line and include both rational and irrational numbers. They are important in mathematics because they are used to describe quantities and measurements in the real world and are the foundation for more complex mathematical concepts and theories.
Lemma 1.2.3 is used in real analysis as a crucial step in proving a theorem. It often involves breaking down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable parts and using mathematical techniques and definitions to show that each part is true, leading to the proof of the main theorem.
Yes, Lemma 1.2.3 can be applied to other mathematical fields as it is a general proof technique that can be used to prove theorems in various branches of mathematics. However, its specific application may vary depending on the context and concepts being studied.