Lenard Jones Potential & wavenumber

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ian2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential wavenumber
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Lenard-Jones potential and its relation to the wavenumber in monatomic crystalline solids. It establishes that while the wavenumber \( k \) is typically considered positive, it can take negative values in specific contexts, such as in left-handed materials or during Fourier analysis. The group velocity, defined as the derivative of the dispersion relation \( \omega = \omega(k) \), remains consistent regardless of the sign of \( k \). The negative sign in the wave vector indicates direction rather than altering the physical meaning of the wavenumber itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lenard-Jones potential in solid-state physics
  • Familiarity with dispersion relations and group velocity
  • Knowledge of wave vectors and their directional properties
  • Basic concepts of Fourier analysis and negative frequencies
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of negative wavenumbers in left-handed materials
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of group velocity from dispersion relations
  • Investigate the role of Fourier analysis in wave propagation
  • Learn about the physical significance of negative frequencies in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying solid-state physics, particularly those interested in wave propagation and dispersion relations in crystalline solids.

ian2012
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering, given that you have the dispersion relation omega = omega(k) for a Lenard-Jones potential in say a monatomic crystalline solid of lattice spacing a, which is proportional to sin(ka/2) where k is the wavenumber. The group velocity is the derivative of the dispersion relation with respect to k.
My Question is: Can the wavenumber take negative values in general? (Would it be physically meaningful?). I am thinking it would be okay, as the group velocity would have the same values as if k>0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Typically no, with a few exceptions. We generally deal with the wave number in terms of the wave vector. The wave vector can certainly be negative as it is indicative of the direction of the phase and group propagation. However, the negative sign is part of the directional vector and not of the wave number. The only time that you should have a negative wave number is with a left-handed material as the wave number is defined as

[tex]k = \omega\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}[/tex]

Still, there are times where we do talk about negative frequencies (which would give us negative k) when we are doing a Fourier analysis. These negative frequencies are generally just the complex conjugate of the positive frequency parts and so you can usually fold over the Fourier domain so that you deal only with frequencies greater or equal to zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K