Length of a one-dimensional box with an electron inside

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HuntMBryan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Electron Length
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the length (L) of a one-dimensional box containing an electron transitioning between energy levels n=2 and n=4, with a wavelength of 418nm. The correct approach involves using the energy difference formula ΔE = E4 - E2, where ΔE is derived from the Planck equation E = hv, linking the energy absorbed by the electron to the wavelength of light. The confusion arises from misinterpreting the wavelength as the de Broglie wavelength instead of the wavelength of the absorbed photon. The discussion clarifies that the wavelength pertains to light, not the electron's de Broglie wavelength.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically energy levels in quantum systems.
  • Familiarity with the Planck equation (E = hv) and its application in photon energy calculations.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between wavelength (λ), frequency (v), and the speed of light (c = λv).
  • Basic grasp of the concept of a one-dimensional potential box in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Planck equation (E = hv) in quantum transitions.
  • Learn about the implications of the de Broglie wavelength in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of energy levels in quantum systems and their mathematical representation.
  • Investigate the properties of one-dimensional quantum wells and their significance in modern physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in the behavior of electrons in potential wells and energy transitions.

HuntMBryan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Another student was asking me about how to calculate L in a one-dimensional box, given that an electron with a wavelength of 418nm moves from energy-level n=2 to energy-level n=4.


Using, ΔE = Ef - Ei, I can say that ΔE = E4 - E2 = ((42 - 22) * h2 ) / (8mL2)

Rearranging for L is simple, but I was unsure on how to get ΔE. I used de Broglie to get speed and put that speed into KE = (1/2)mu2 and the teacher told me not to use that.

One of the lab teachers was telling me to use c = λv to get v and then use E = hv to calculate the energy that the electron absorbs to move from n2 to n4.

My question is why we are using E = hv. Why is light being associated with the electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HuntMBryan said:
Another student was asking me about how to calculate L in a one-dimensional box, given that an electron with a wavelength of 418nm moves from energy-level n=2 to energy-level n=4.


Using, ΔE = Ef - Ei, I can say that ΔE = E4 - E2 = ((42 - 22) * h2 ) / (8mL2)

Rearranging for L is simple, but I was unsure on how to get ΔE. I used de Broglie to get speed and put that speed into KE = (1/2)mu2 and the teacher told me not to use that.

One of the lab teachers was telling me to use c = λv to get v and then use E = hv to calculate the energy that the electron absorbs to move from n2 to n4.

My question is why we are using E = hv. Why is light being associated with the electron?

The question as stated in your original post is mis-phrased. The wavelength referenced in the problem is not the deBroglie wavelength of the electron as implied, but rather the wavelength of light absorbed by the electron in making a transition between the n=2 and n=4 levels. That is why you use the Planck equation to calculate the photon energy from the wavelength of light used.
 
Yeah, I was wondering about that. I'll go see if I can pull up the original problem. The wording was really really bad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
11K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
3K