Levitating Magnets: The Superconducting Solution?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Forestman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of magnet levitation above superconductors, specifically exploring the mechanisms that allow this to occur without the magnet flipping over, in contrast to normal magnetic interactions. The scope includes theoretical explanations and conceptual clarifications regarding the Meissner effect and flux pinning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a magnet does not flip over when levitating above a superconductor, contrasting it with normal magnetic behavior.
  • Another participant attributes the levitation to the Meissner effect, suggesting that the superconductor repels the magnet, while also noting that a weak attractive magnetism is induced due to inhomogeneities in the superconductor.
  • A different participant challenges this view, stating that the levitation is due to flux pinning effects rather than induced magnetism.
  • Further elaboration on flux pinning is provided, describing it as a local potential energy minimum that stabilizes the magnet's position relative to the superconductor's magnetic field lines.
  • It is noted that the levitating state of a normal magnet is unstable, leading to a tendency to flip over and reach a lower energy state when perturbed.
  • A later reply expresses understanding of the concepts after reviewing additional resources, indicating a learning progression in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms behind magnet levitation above superconductors, particularly regarding the roles of the Meissner effect and flux pinning. No consensus is reached on the primary explanation for the phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the interplay between induced magnetism and flux pinning without resolving the complexities of these interactions. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on definitions and assumptions related to superconductivity and magnetic behavior.

Forestman
Messages
212
Reaction score
2
With normal magnetic objects if you try to make one levitate above the other, it will just flip over and stick to the other magnet. Why does this not happen when using a superconductor. Why is a magnet able to levitate above a superconductor without flipping over to the opposite poll.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnet and superconductor repel due to the Meissner effect, not due to the the superconductor being a magnet.

A weak (attractive) magnetism is induced due to inhomogeneities in the superconductor, which leads to the the attractive force holding the magnet in place.
 
alxm said:
A weak (attractive) magnetism is induced due to inhomogeneities in the superconductor, which leads to the the attractive force holding the magnet in place.

uhh no.

It's due to flux pinning effects.
 
alxm said:
A weak (attractive) magnetism is induced due to inhomogeneities in the superconductor, which leads to the the attractive force holding the magnet in place.

nbo10 said:
uhh no.

It's due to flux pinning effects.

In a way alxm is describing the flux pinning effect. I don't intuitively see it as an attractive force, more as just a local potential energy minimum for the system when the field lines line up. A small movement by either object would make the field lines want to bend close to the the boundaries if the superconductor to still line up, thus the curvature of the lines would increase which is equal to a higher energy state. Therefore it will require an external force to move either the magnet or the superconductor.

To address the original question: the superconductor is not a magnet in the same way, the flux pinning effect merely "freezes" the magnetic field lines in a certain configuration inside the superconductor (because of inhomogeneities in the superconductor). It will be more desirable for the magnet to have its field lines line up with the ones frozen in the superconductor, therefore it will strive to stay in the place it was when the field lines where frozen (when the superconductor entered its superconducting phase).

If you have a magnet levitating above another, then it will flip over since the system is in an unstable equilibrium. The levitating state is at a stationary point, but not at a local potential energy minimum. A tiny perturberation of the system will make it "roll down the potential hill" by flipping over and reaching a lower energy state.
 
Thanks phz, I understand it now. I also watched a video on You Tube about it, and that really helped.
 

Similar threads

High School Why is my small Bi-2223 superconductor not levitating or locking above magnets?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Superconductors and the Meissner effect
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Meissner effect and conservation of momentum in magnetic levitation
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Is a diamagnetic levitation engine possible?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
High School Magnetic Levitation (electromagnets?) for an 11th grader
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
High School Superfluid Helium and its use at CERN
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Undergrad Magnetic levitation - superconductors
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Why is my magnetic levitation experiment not working?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Graduate A question on superconductivity
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Graduate Superconductors - some general questions.
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K