Nano-Passion
- 1,291
- 0
Whats the work life of an experimental physicist like? Hours? Pay? Activities and duties? etc. etc.
The discussion revolves around the work life of an experimental physicist, including aspects such as hours worked, salary ranges, and daily activities. Participants explore the variability in experiences and outcomes within the field, highlighting the broad nature of the inquiry.
Participants generally disagree on the validity of seeking an average salary or typical work life, with some asserting that the variability in experiences makes such averages meaningless. The discussion remains unresolved regarding what constitutes a typical experience for experimental physicists.
The discussion highlights the limitations of broad questions in capturing the diversity of experiences among experimental physicists, as well as the dependence on specific career paths and personal choices that influence work life and salary.
Norman said:Useless question. It is much too broad. Because the question is too broad, the associated variance on the answers is going to swamp out their validity.
I know experimentalists who make 30k and ones who make 300K/year. I know experimentalists that work 9-5, 5 days a week. And ones who work 60 hour weeks consistently.
Norman said:The guy did his PhD in astronomy, but he focused on the optics used and how to design optical systems. He now works for a company designing, testing, researching, etc. gun scopes. He loves his job and they pay him really well.
Nano-Passion said:Interesting. But it seems like an mathematical outlier in the data.
Nano-Passion said:I would rather have the average
Sheets said:I'm not sure how insightful asking for the average of what experimentalists overal make--my guess is it is similar to theoreticians. It is probably more meaningful to think about where you want your career to go: national lab, R1 university, slacs, or industry and then compare mid-career wages.
As for a 'typical' workweek for this experimentalist: Lately I've spent a lot of time writing C++/python code to analyze data, thought long and hard about tricky statistical problems, built and ran monte carlo simulations of physics events and detector simulations, and actually found time to go the lab and measure something.
Vanadium 50 said:Dismissing a data point because it doesn't agree with your prejudices is the mark of a poor scientist.
There is no "average". That's what people have been trying to tell you. I don't understand why you ask questions and don't pay any attention to the answers. This is also a mark of a poor scientist.