Fractal Geometry in Extra-Terrestrial Images: Discovering Life on Mars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tokenman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Mars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of fractal geometry to images of extra-terrestrial objects, specifically in the context of determining whether such objects might be biological in nature. The conversation references a specific NASA image purported to show a 'segmented worm' on Mars and explores the implications of fractal patterns in biological versus non-biological entities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a NASA image of a 'segmented worm' and questions whether fractal patterns can indicate biological origins.
  • Another participant asserts that fractal geometry cannot serve as a definitive test for biological identification.
  • A different participant suggests that while fractal patterns may not confirm biological status, they could help eliminate non-biological candidates.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for confusion between biological structures and crystalline formations, with examples provided to illustrate that fractal growth does not necessarily imply biological origins.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the existence of the 'segmented worm,' attributing it to misinformation.
  • One participant proposes that geological processes can also create fractal structures, complicating the interpretation of such patterns in extra-terrestrial images.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the applicability of fractal geometry to biological identification in extra-terrestrial images. There is no consensus, as some argue against its utility while others see potential merit in further exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific images and claims that may lack consensus or definitive evidence. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the structures being analyzed and the definitions of biological versus non-biological entities.

tokenman
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Does anyone remember the Nasa image of the 'segmented worm' found on Mars?
I had recently seen a documentary on PBS about fractals in which it was stated that all biology is based on fractals and that if one could establish a fractal pattern in something, then it was certainly biological.
I wrote Nasa several emails asking them whether they had done any such experiments to determine whether or not the 'segmented worm' showed any fractal patterns in it's makeup. I never got any response back.
So I put the question to you:
Can fractal geometry be applied to images of extra-terrestrial objects to determine whether they are biological or not?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
tokenman said:
Can fractal geometry be applied to images of extra-terrestrial objects to determine whether they are biological or not?

As a definitive test, no.
 
Thank you for your answer.
I wouldn't take it as proof, but couldn't one eliminate that which is definitely not biological with this test, thus leaving the door open to further experiments?
 
Crystals can also grow in a fractal pattern: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TXW-4RRNXS1-2&_user=10&_coverDate=03%2F17%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1389955839&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=284d3c7a76added48cf85e57de2362ad"

There are other examples as well: http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v35/i9/p4012_1"

Thus the answer to your question is a no, fractal growth does not mean it is biological.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for your answer. I do think, in reference to the original premise, that one could easily tell the difference between a crystalline substance and a segmented worm which tapers at both ends. Perhaps my question is the problem.
Do you think there would be any merit whatsoever in applying this test to images taken extra-terrestrially?
I promise not to push the question any further after this. :)
 
What segmented worm? That is Richard Hoagland nonsense.
 
D H said:
What segmented worm?

My thoughts precisely.
 
Not segmented worm, 'segmented worm'. Whatever image we happened to find, we would not confuse it with that of a 'snowflake'.
"Do you think there would be any merit whatsoever in applying this test to images taken extra-terrestrially?"
 
tokenman said:
Not segmented worm, 'segmented worm'. Whatever image we happened to find, we would not confuse it with that of a 'snowflake'.
"Do you think there would be any merit whatsoever in applying this test to images taken extra-terrestrially?"

By 'segmented worm' I presume you are talking about the sand dunes which go by a variety of names like 'glass worms' 'glass tubes' etc.. I'm pretty sure itw as concluded they were sanddunes in some sort of narrow crevice.

Anyways.

For your question, yes studying such things can lead to assuming that such a structure was created by a lifeform but it's far from definitive. There are geological activities that can make fractal structures (AFAIK).
 
  • #10
The question has already been answered.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K