Lifting an Object: Work, Force, and Cosine

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jonasrosa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics concept of work, specifically the formula W=F*D*cos(θ). Participants clarify that when lifting an object vertically, the angle θ between the applied force and the direction of motion is 0°, resulting in maximum work done. Misinterpretations regarding the angle and its implications on work calculations are addressed, emphasizing the importance of understanding vector definitions in physics. A diagram illustrating force, direction, and angle is recommended for clearer comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly work and force
  • Familiarity with the formula W=F*D*cos(θ)
  • Knowledge of vector definitions in physics
  • Ability to interpret angles in relation to force and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the vector definition of work, specifically W = ∫F·ds
  • Learn about the implications of angles in force applications
  • Explore graphical representations of force, motion, and angles
  • Investigate scenarios where force opposes motion and its effect on work
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of work, force, and vector analysis in mechanical contexts.

jonasrosa
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
If W= F*d*cos(θ), is it just going to be 0?
So, from what I remember, W=F*D*cos (θ). If I'm lifting, θ=90° and so, the cos = 0. So is the work just 0? Why? I still moved the object through a distance, which is the usual non-mathematical definition of Work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. :smile:

How are you defining ##\theta## ? Work is force multiplied by distance through the path of the applied force. When you are lifting something, what is the direction and path of the applied force?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and jonasrosa
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF. :smile:

How are you defining ##\theta## ? Work is force multiplied by distance through the path of the applied force. When you are lifting something, what is the direction and path of the applied force?
Ok, so, from what I remember ##\theta##? was the angle between the force and the object (meaning the angle at which I'm moving rhe object). So, horizontal movement would be a 0° angle and vertical would be 90°. It's been quite a while since I've studied physics, so I'm very rusty, but I was studying work today and I remember seeing this formula and it got me confused
 
Yeah, so it sounds like you're trying to apply a "formula" for a situation where the variables are not defined correctly. It's better to try to understand the vector definition of Work, instead of trying to apply simplified formulas without understanding where they come from.

Have you had any introduction to vectors yet in your learning?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, topsquark and erobz
$$ W = \int \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{s}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jonasrosa said:
Ok, so, from what I remember ##\theta##? was the angle between the force and the object (meaning the angle at which I'm moving rhe object). So, horizontal movement would be a 0° angle and vertical would be 90°. It's been quite a while since I've studied physics, so I'm very rusty, but I was studying work today and I remember seeing this formula and it got me confused
You’ve got the angles backwards. To lift an object you apply a vertical force, not a horizontal one. The angle between force and displacement when lifting straight up is therefore zero.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and russ_watters
berkeman said:
Yeah, so it sounds like you're trying to apply a "formula" for a situation where the variables are not defined correctly. It's better to try to understand the vector definition of Work, instead of trying to apply simplified formulas without understanding where they come from.

Have you had any introduction to vectors yet in your learning?
I have, but it was over 5 years ago. I am trying to understand what the formula means and why it doesn't apply on this situation or what am I misinterpreting, because once I realized this, it felt very weird
 
Orodruin said:
You’ve got the angles backwards. To lift an object you apply a vertical force, not a horizontal one. The angle between force and displacement when lifting straight up is therefore zero.
Ok, I think I get it. So, what matters is the angle of the force in relation to the movement? So, if I'm applying vertical force to move something vertically, the angle is 0 and if I apply horizontal force to move something horizontally, the angle is also 0?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jonasrosa said:
Ok, I think I get it. So, what matters is the angle of the force in relation to the movement? So, if I'm applying vertical force to move something vertically, the angle is 0 and if I apply horizontal force to move something horizontally, the angle is also 0?
Yes.
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
Yes.
Ok, now it makes sense. Thanks a lot.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #11
jonasrosa said:
Ok, now it makes sense. Thanks a lot.
FYI, this would all be a lot clearer if you drew a diagram and labeled the force, direction of motion and angle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #12
russ_watters said:
FYI, this would all be a lot clearer if you drew a diagram and labeled the force, direction of motion and angle.
Yes, probably. Didn't think of doing that. Thanks a lot
 
  • #13
jonasrosa said:
Ok, I think I get it. So, what matters is the angle of the force in relation to the movement? So, if I'm applying vertical force to move something vertically, the angle is 0 and if I apply horizontal force to move something horizontally, the angle is also 0?
Also, realize that if the force is opposed to the motion such as a block is moving to the right but a force on it points to the left, the angle is 180° and the cosine is -1. That means the block is slowing down.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
18K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K