Light interferometry as described in Thorne's black holes and time warps ?

In summary, Thorne's "Black Holes and Time Warps" describes light interferometry, specifically in regards to a laser interferometric gravitational wave detector. Thorne explains that the waves reaching the photodetector interfere destructively while the waves reaching back to the source interfere constructively. This is due to the beam splitter in the system, which changes the phase of the waves. Thorne's explanation may be confusing, but it can be broken down by considering each step in the process and taking into account the effects of the beam splitter.
  • #1
matteo210
11
0
light interferometry as described in Thorne's "black holes and time warps"?

hello,

maybe someone who read the book can help me with this, but i'll give all the information so that even someone who hasn't read it can understand.
At page 383 and following, and at fig. 10.6 and box 10.3, Thorne describes the basic functioning of a laser interferometric gravitational wave detector. My question is not relative to the "gravitational" part but only to the laser interferometry. In the box and in the figure (link below), Thorne writes that the "waves" reaching the photodetector interfere destructively while the "waves" reaching back the laser/emitter/source interfere constructively. Shouldn't it be the opposite? i was thinking that the "waves" reaching the photodetector, traveling the same distance in space at the same time, (both being reflected twice and passing thru the mirror once), would interfere constructively. Why Thorne writes the opposite instead?
For anyone who has not access to the book, i found this site which has a picture similar to the one in the book
http://plus.maths.org/issue18/features/thorne/
it's the drawing rapresenting laser interferometry. In the book Thorne writes that there should be no light in the photodetector due to destructive interference. Why it is not the opposite (all the light in the photodetector due to costructive interference)?
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
matteo210 said:
i was thinking that the "waves" reaching the photodetector, traveling the same distance in space at the same time, (both being reflected twice and passing thru the mirror once), would interfere constructively.

You're leaving out a key component of the system: the beam splitter. The laser light comes from the source, goes through the beam splitter, travels out the two arms, gets reflected, travels back, and reaches the beam splitter again. If the arms are exactly the same length, then what happens is that the beam "splitter" just functions as a beam "recombiner"--it just combines the two split beams back into one beam that is traveling in the direction it originally came from--i.e., towards the laser source. That's because the beams coming back are just the exact reverse of the beams going out, so going back through the beam splitter just reverses the splitting and sends all the light back to the source (as long as the arm lengths have stayed the same).

Thorne phrases it in terms of constructive and destructive interference, but he's really saying the same thing as the above. If you want to break it down in more detail, you need to consider each step in the process and take into account what the beam splitter does. So to start, we have a beam coming from the laser source and being split at the beam splitter into two beams: one beam goes straight through and is unchanged, and the other gets reflected by 90 degrees and has its phase reversed (i.e., shifted by 180 degrees). Call the beam that goes straight through from the laser source beam A, and the beam that gets reflected by 90 degrees beam B.

Now the beams each travel out their respective arms, get reflected, and come back along the two arms and pass through the beam splitter again. Beam A now gets split into a part that goes straight back to the laser detector with its phase unchanged, and a part that gets reflected by 90 degrees and goes towards the photodetector; but the reflected part also has its phase unchanged, because reflection only changes the phase on the front side of the beam splitter (the side facing the laser source), not the back side (the side facing the arm beam A travels along). Beam B also gets split into a part that goes straight through to the photodetector, and another part that gets reflected by 90 degrees; and since this reflection is off the front side of the beam splitter, it shifts the phase by 180 degrees.

So on the laser source side, we have the part of beam A that went straight through both times with phase unchanged, and the part of beam B that got reflected twice with a phase shift of 180 degrees each time. So the two are in phase and interfere constructively.

But on the photodetector side, we have the part of beam A that got reflected once off the back side of the splitter, so its phase is unchanged, and the part of beam B that got reflected once off the front side of the beam splitter, so its phase got shifted by 180 degrees. So the two are 180 degrees out of phase and interfere destructively.
 

1. What is light interferometry?

Light interferometry is a technique used in physics and astronomy to measure the properties of light waves. It involves splitting a beam of light into two or more separate beams, then recombining them to produce an interference pattern that can be analyzed to gather information about the light's properties.

2. How is light interferometry used to study black holes?

In Thorne's book, light interferometry is used to study the effects of gravity on light near black holes. By analyzing the interference patterns produced by light traveling near a black hole, scientists can gain insight into the structure and properties of these mysterious objects.

3. What are some potential applications of light interferometry?

Light interferometry has a wide range of potential applications, including studying distant stars and galaxies, detecting exoplanets, and measuring the expansion of the universe. It is also used in various technologies, such as optical communications and medical imaging.

4. What are the advantages of using light interferometry over other techniques?

Compared to other methods, light interferometry offers high precision and sensitivity, allowing scientists to gather detailed information about light waves. It also has the advantage of being non-invasive, meaning it does not disturb the objects being studied.

5. Are there any limitations to using light interferometry?

One limitation of light interferometry is that it requires complex and expensive equipment. It also relies on having a stable and controlled environment, which can be challenging to maintain. Additionally, light interferometry is most effective for studying objects that emit or reflect light, so it may not be suitable for all types of scientific research.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
635
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
760
Replies
35
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
813
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top