Light Refraction: Which Material Takes Longest?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time it takes for light to pass through different materials with varying indices of refraction. The original poster questions which material would take the longest time for light to traverse, given three materials with the same thickness but different refractive indices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the index of refraction and light speed, with some suggesting that a higher index indicates longer traversal time. Others question the assumptions regarding the angle of incidence and the uniformity of conditions across the materials.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the implications of different angles of incidence, while others have raised questions about the assumptions in the original problem statement. There is no explicit consensus on the answer, but the conversation is delving into the complexities of light behavior in different media.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding the angles at which light approaches the materials, which could significantly affect the outcomes. There is also a discussion about the relevance of very thin layers of materials and their impact on refraction, indicating a need for clarity on the definitions and conditions of the problem.

baileya
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If we have 3 materials with the same thickness but different indices of refraction (1st= 1.33, 3rd=2.419) which would take the longest time for light to pass through? Why?


Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


I want to say it's the third one simply because it has the higher n value, but I'm unsure as to why? Is it because the higher n value causes the light to bounce around inside the material a lot before leaving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The problem is impossible to answer. It does not state that the light is approaching at the same angle or through the same median before it comes in contact with the three materials. And then we can think of a situation where light was traveling at 90 degrees to the normal originally for cases (1) and (3) yet traveling at 0 degrees to the normal in case (2), in which case the finite time from (2) is faster than the infinite times for cases (1) and (3). Similarly, we could then think of an instance where light is traveling at 90 degrees to the normal for cases (1) and (2) but at 0 degrees for case (3). Then, (3) would be the answer using the finite-infinite argument.

Do you see the arbitrary nature of the question's wording?

Surely, however, it seems to presuppose the same medians and same original angles, but we could then say, since the question has not defined it, what if I chose the original angle to be 90 degrees? Then, the answer would be, "none are faster," because all times would approach infinity.
 


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index"

With the assumption that the incident angle for the light is zero degrees to the normal, then the traversal time is determined by the speed of light in the various media. The speed of light is intimately associated with the index of refraction, as you will see in the above link.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Is there a minimum thickness for refraction to occur? In other words, can you ignore a very *very* thin layer (20nm or so) of a material that is even a high index (like n=2) in between two layers of lower index? You would still get potential TIR at high-low index interface, right?

Thanks.
 


I think that for *very* thin layers you'd have to look more deeply into the physics of what happens at the surfaces of the materials. At those scales, how can you tell for sure when you've left one material and entered another?
 


gneill, I'm not talking about atomic level thicknesses .. but let's say a 10th of the wavelength, or 20nm. Is this too thin to cause refraction? Is the ray path altered transmitting through this layer?
 


atkinson75 said:
gneill, I'm not talking about atomic level thicknesses .. but let's say a 10th of the wavelength, or 20nm. Is this too thin to cause refraction? Is the ray path altered transmitting through this layer?

I would say that, yes, the ray path will be altered. I suppose whether or not the path change is significant would depend upon what equipment you have to measure it!

I hear that the refractive index of dielectric thin films depends upon thickness. Now, what constitutes the thickness of said films, I don't know. Presumably at least several atomic layers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K