Light scattering (rayleigh scattering)

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghed87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of infrared (IR) light that results in a scattering intensity of 2.00% compared to visible light at 520nm. The relationship between intensity and wavelength is defined by the equation I(light)/I(IR) = (wavelength of IR / wavelength of light)^4. The correct wavelength for the IR light is determined to be approximately 1960nm, but the initial calculation was flawed due to a misunderstanding of the percentage relationship, where 2% corresponds to a ratio of 50, not 200.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rayleigh scattering principles
  • Familiarity with the inverse fourth power law of wavelength
  • Basic knowledge of percentage calculations
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Rayleigh scattering and its applications in physics
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of scattering intensity equations
  • Explore the relationship between wavelength and intensity in different mediums
  • Review percentage calculations and their implications in scientific contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on optics and scattering phenomena, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to wavelength and intensity ratios.

spaghed87
Messages
24
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


For what wavelength of light is the scattering only 2.00% that of light with a visible wavelength of 520nm?

NOTE: The intensity of scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength.


Homework Equations


I(light)/I(IR)=(wavelength of IR / wavelength of light)^4=200


The Attempt at a Solution


I(520)/I(IR)=(Lamda/520nm)^4=200

Where, Lamda is equal to the wavelength of the IR light.

Lamda is ~1960nm (this answer seems to be wrong, why? Do you see an error anywhere? This is going to be how you solve it so the error shouldn't be that big or that a different equation is needed. I know I'm on the right track.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An elementary mistake: 2% has nothing to do with 200.
 
well, according to this solution.

http://www.mscd.edu/~physics/denn/solutions/Ch23/EOC_Solution_23_25.pdf

They used 100 for 1%?

This is the same problem except they are working with a scattering of 1.00% and a wavelength of 500nm.

100 is what the ratio of the intensities is equal to. However, I cannot see where the number 100 is coming from in the solution to the similair problem. They did not specify in the solution. Does the number 100 relate to 1% at all?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, as in 1%=1/100.
 
Thanks, I see now. I've passed differential equations even... I have always got stumped on simple mathmatical things like percentages though. For some reason my brain was thinking just to double the value of 100 for 2%. I do stupid stuff like that all the time. =(
 
You're welcome :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K