Light speed spaceship time travel conundrum

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of time dilation in relation to a spaceship traveling at the speed of light and a planet 50 light years away. From Earth's perspective, the journey would take 50 years, but for the travelers on the spaceship, time would slow down and only one year would pass. This raises questions about the travelers' experience of the journey and the instruments on board showing speed. It is clarified that the speed of the spaceship would be 0.99980 times the speed of light, and both the travelers and those on Earth would agree that 50.001 years have passed when the spaceship arrives at its destination. The concept of celerity is also mentioned, and the question of whether time changed or physical
  • #36
yuiop said:
Lets say at the time the ship launched, a "spaceship launched" signal is sent from Earth to the distant planet. When the ship arrives at the distant planet, the proud astronaut announces he has traveled from Earth at 50x the speed of light. The greeter at the planet says "That is odd, because the launched signal arrived just before you and it was traveling at 1X the speed of light. Did you take the scenic route?".

Actually, yes and no. You are right about the arrival times, but the astronaut would not announce that he has traveled 50x the speed of light. He would announce that he has traveled 300 trillion miles in one year. There is a difference.

To the traveler, the passage of time slows down to 1/50th of what it is here on earth. What that means is during a given relative interval (1 minute travel time verses 1 minute Earth time) the traveler actually takes in 50x the light. That means that from the travelers perspective, a light year would be 50x the size. If you take the distance they travel as a numerical constant by saying they are 300 trillion miles apart (roughly 50 light years from Earth's perspective) then everything makes a little more sense. To the traveler's eyes they never violated the speed of light, the speed of light was just raised from their relative perspective (or more precisely a year is 50x as long).

I know your thinking "Hold on, the speed of light is a constant!" and you are right. The term "year" is the variable here. If you define a year as the length of time it takes for the Earth to make one revolution around the sun, then the traveler would actually be in space for the full 50 years. From their perspective they see the Earth make 50 complete revolutions around the sun, and thus know that they have traveled for 50 years. If on the other hand you are defining a year as the amount of time that passes from our perspective as the Earth revolves around the sun (ie how much we age in a "year") then the traveler would only experience 1 year in space, and since a year passes at 1/50th the rate for them the term "light year" would have a different meaning and contain 50x the distance.

Since we are measuring a speed, which is distance over time, and time is relative, then the actual speed has to be relative in the same way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
sicarius said:
Actually, yes and no. You are right about the arrival times, but the astronaut would not announce that he has traveled 50x the speed of light. He would announce that he has traveled 300 trillion miles in one year. There is a difference.

To the traveler, the passage of time slows down to 1/50th of what it is here on earth. What that means is during a given relative interval (1 minute travel time verses 1 minute Earth time) the traveler actually takes in 50x the light. That means that from the travelers perspective, a light year would be 50x the size. If you take the distance they travel as a numerical constant by saying they are 300 trillion miles apart (roughly 50 light years from Earth's perspective) then everything makes a little more sense. To the traveler's eyes they never violated the speed of light, the speed of light was just raised from their relative perspective (or more precisely a year is 50x as long).

I know your thinking "Hold on, the speed of light is a constant!" and you are right. The term "year" is the variable here. If you define a year as the length of time it takes for the Earth to make one revolution around the sun, then the traveler would actually be in space for the full 50 years. From their perspective they see the Earth make 50 complete revolutions around the sun, and thus know that they have traveled for 50 years. If on the other hand you are defining a year as the amount of time that passes from our perspective as the Earth revolves around the sun (ie how much we age in a "year") then the traveler would only experience 1 year in space, and since a year passes at 1/50th the rate for them the term "light year" would have a different meaning and contain 50x the distance.

Since we are measuring a speed, which is distance over time, and time is relative, then the actual speed has to be relative in the same way.

Don't go filling people's heads with crazy ideas.

The traveler does not see a light year as 50x normal size. A light year will be the same distance light travels in one year. And he will measure the speed of light as 300,000km/s.

The traveller in the spaceship experiences no strange changes at all. Time dilation is never experienced in one's own FoR; it is only observed in others' FoR.

However, if he looks out the window, he will see several things of particular note:
1] Everything along his path of travel will appear compressed. Planets will be disks, distances to stars will be much shorter, the entire universe will be squashed along his direction of travel.

This is how he can reconcile getting to this distant planet so fast. He measures the star as only 1/50th of the distance it was when measured on Earth.

2] The light and other radiation will be blue-shifted in front of them and red-shifted behind them.
3] Everything will appear to be moving slowly - including the Earth's passage around the sun.

But in his spaceship, he will experience time passage as normal.
 
Last edited:
  • #38
sicarius said:
Since we are measuring a speed, which is distance over time, and time is relative, then the actual speed has to be relative in the same way.
You are forgetting that distance is relative too. While his clocks slow down relative to clocks on Earth, his perception of distance changes too, so if he measures time using his own clocks and distance using his own rulers, then he gets the correct speed.
 
  • #39
if this could really happen then we all have unlocked the laws of nature and energy because if we travel at a light speed then after reaching a limit if we look at the Earth then we would be in future and have traveled through time
 
Last edited:
  • #40
another thing can happen and the person or anything inside the spacecraft will slow down and when he returns on the Earth after a long time his age will be slowed down and he will grow slower than all of us and when we reach at the age of 70 he will still be at the age of 20 or 30
 

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
423
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top