Light through a medium with variable refraction index

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an integral related to light refraction in a medium with a variable refractive index, specifically using the Euler-Lagrange equation. The refractive index is modeled as n[y]=n_0e^{-\alpha y} with n_0 set to 1.5, and the goal is to find the value of alpha given the integral equation. Initial attempts revealed that the integral seemed unsolvable due to a negative result on one side, leading to confusion about the correct approach. However, a correction was made regarding the integral's formulation, identifying the need for a +/- sign, which allowed for a valid solution for alpha and a coherent trajectory for the light ray. This highlights the importance of careful mathematical formulation in solving physics problems.
WackStr
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is from hand and finch. We proved in the previous problem that (using euler lagrange equation):

x=\int_0^y\frac{dy}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{n[y]}{n_0}\right)-1}}

where n_0 is the refractive index at y=0 and x=0. The ray enters horizontally.

As an actual computation the book says that assume n[y]=n_0e^{-\alpha y} and n_0=1.5. Aslo y(30)=-1.

We need to find \alpha

The Attempt at a Solution



From the information given it seems like the equation we need to solve is

30=\int_0^{-1}\frac{dy}{\sqrt{e^{-2\alpha y}-1}} for \alpha but it seems like this equation has no solution.

So I am stuck at this point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematica solves that integral.

But I don't know how to actually solve it.

I can post the solution to the integral if you want.
 
I know mathematic gives an analytical expression in terms of \alpha but the equation seems to have no solution. (the integral is negative and the left hand side is positive)
 
Are you sure you're not supposed to assume alpha is small and approximate e^(-2ay) as 1-2ay?
 
actually I have a typo in the original integral it should be \left(\frac{n[y]}{n_0}\right)^2 and I figured out what the problem was. To get the expression we had to take a square root. So there should be a +/- sign. If we use the + sign we don't get a solution because RHS < 0 and LHS > 0, but we do get a solution if we put a - sign next to the initial integral and it gives a value for alpha and a nice trajectory for the light ray in the medium.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K