Lightbulbs flicker due to AC. Why does this not show up in photographs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quozzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ac
AI Thread Summary
Lightbulbs flicker due to alternating current, with traditional tungsten bulbs cycling at 50Hz/60Hz, but this flicker is typically imperceptible to the human eye. When photographing these bulbs with a fast shutter speed, no significant brightness variation is observed because the filament's heat capacity prevents it from cooling down quickly enough to show the flicker. Fluorescent lamps exhibit more noticeable flicker, particularly with magnetic ballasts, which can be detected in high-speed photographs. The use of electronic ballasts in compact fluorescents results in much higher switching frequencies, reducing flicker effects. Overall, while flicker exists, it is often not significant enough to impact most indoor lighting scenarios.
quozzy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
This problem just occurred to me while I was taking photos indoors:

Light sources powered by mains fluctuate in intensity due to alternating current. In other words, a lightbulb will actually flicker on and off at 50Hz/60Hz (or, really, 100Hz/120Hz, since I guess it should be the absolute value) in Europe/US respectively. This is not noticeable to humans because it is faster than the refresh rate of our eyes, so we perceive a constant stream of light.

So far, so good.

But what if we take a camera and adjust its shutter speed to something significantly shorter, such as, say, 1/1000 seconds. We should be able to observe the fluctuation in that, in a succession of photos taken indoors, some will be brighter than others. I just tried this a number of times by taking photos of a lightbulb, and there is no visible difference (either in the photo or on the histogram) between any of the photos. Why is that?
 
Science news on Phys.org
It is not an on-off flicker - the luminance ratio between max and min is quite small: for typical traditional tungsten lightbulbs it is less than 1/2EV.

The reason is heat capacity of the tungsten wire - it won't radiate all energy from previous half-cycle before the next cycle heats it up again.

There is more flicker in fluorescent lamps - you may spot it on photos made with high speed shutters.
 
You may find the following interesting:
In an otherwise dark room, turn on a light. Then, put your hand over your eyes, and look in the direction of that light. Then, as simultaneously as possible remove your hand and turn the light off. You'll notice the filament still glowing. The first time I did this I was rather surprised how bright the light was a second after being turned off. You just don't notice it normally because your eyes don't adjust to darkness fast enough. It's worth doing with both traditional and florescent bulbs.
 
If you hook up a simple photodiode to an oscilloscope and point it at the overhead fluorescent bulbs, you can clearly see the 120 Hz sine wave. If that's the only light in the room I'm sure you could notice differences between photos taken at different times in the cycle if your shutter speed is much faster than 1/120 second, like say 1/1000 second.
 
Fluorescent bulbs do flicker significantly if they are using a magnetic ballast. However, incandescent bulbs don't flicker very much due to the filament's heat capacity, and compact fluorescent bulbs don't flicker significantly either because they use an electronic ballast that has a much, much higher switching frequency (several kilohertz). In most cases, I doubt that a large percentage of the illumination of a room is from magnetic-ballasted fluorescent lights, so the flicker should not be a terribly significant effect.
 
It is possible to visually detect the flicker with a simple http://www.google.com/search?q=strobe+disk". As mentioned above, many fluorescent fixtures now use frequencies much higher than the line's 50 or 60 Hz, so a standard strobe disk may not always work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top