zorro
- 1,378
- 0
What is wrong?
The discussion revolves around the evaluation of limits, particularly in cases where the limit appears to take the form of 'infinity/infinity'. Participants explore the validity of applying l'Hôpital's rule and the implications of rewriting functions to analyze limits. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanations related to limits in calculus.
Participants do not reach a consensus; there are competing views on the validity of applying l'Hôpital's rule and the interpretation of the limit's behavior.
There are unresolved assumptions regarding the conditions under which limits can be evaluated, particularly concerning the finiteness of the limits involved in the quotient rule.
dextercioby said:I hope the OP sees that nothing in his limit diverges so would it need to be <reingeneered> ??
CompuChip said:Nothing's wrong, the fact that you can rewrite the function such that the limit becomes of the form 'infinity/infinity' when evaluated 'naively' does not mean that the limit suddenly no longer exists. In fact, this is one of the cases where we are allowed to apply l'hospital's rule, and we then often find a finite answer.
What you could also do, of course, is rewrite it as
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1 + x^n}{1 + x^n} - \frac{2 x^n}{1 + x^n}[/tex]
and then divide numerator and denominator of the second term by xn (or you can still do that first and then do the same rewriting trick, it just looks a little different).