Lin Alg - Matrix multiplication (Proof by contrapositive)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a linear algebra problem involving matrix multiplication and the proof of a statement by contrapositive. The original poster presents a scenario where two matrices A and B are equal if their product with any n-tuple X is the same.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the contrapositive of the statement, questioning the correctness of both the contrapositive and the proof itself. Some participants affirm the sufficiency of the proof, while others suggest that a direct proof might be clearer.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in evaluating the proof's validity and exploring alternative methods of proof. There is acknowledgment of the proof's correctness, but also a recognition that a direct approach could provide more clarity.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes the simplicity of a direct proof, indicating an awareness of multiple approaches to the problem.

mattmns
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
5
Hello, here is the question my book is asking:

Let A, B be two m x n matricies. Assume that AX = BX for all n-tuples X. Show that A = B.
-------

So I decided to try and prove the contrapositive, which is (unless I am mistaken): If [itex]A \neq B[/itex], then there is some X such that [itex]AX \neq BX[/itex]

Proof:

Assume [itex]A \neq B[/itex]
Then [itex]A^j \neq B^j[/itex] for some j, where [itex]A^j, B^j[/itex] are the j-th columns of A and B.
Then, let [itex]X = E^j[/itex] be the unit vector with 1 in the j-th spot, the same j where [itex]A^j \neq B^j[/itex]
So [itex]AX = AE^j = A^j[/itex] and
[itex]BX = BE^j = B^j[/itex]
and so [itex]AX \neq BX[/itex] for [itex]X = E^j[/itex] as [itex]A^j \neq B^j[/itex]

Thus if [itex]A \neq B[/itex] there is some X such that [itex]AX \neq BX[/itex]
So, as the contrapositive is logically equivalent, we have just showed that if AX = BX for all X, then A = B. Where A, B are two m x n matricies, and X is an n-tuple.
------

First, is the contrapositive correct, and if so then is the proof correct. The whole thing looks perfectly sufficient to me. Thanks!

Also, I just realized that it is very easy to just prove it directly, but I am still curious to see if this is a sufficient proof. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]test\pi[/tex] [tex]$test\pi$[/tex]
 
I would call that sufficient.
 
The proof is good. Proving directly might be more transparant though. You already noted the crucial [itex]AE^j=A^j[/itex], so if [itex]AX=BX[/itex] for all X, then [itex]A^j=AE^j=BE^j=B^j[/itex] for j=1,2,...,n. So A=B.
 
Yep, I saw that just as I was posting my proof. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K