Undergrad Linear Algebra 1 problem, Vector Geometry: Lines

Click For Summary
To find all points on the line L: x = (-3, 1) + t(1,-2) that are 2 units from the point (-3, 1), one approach is to intersect the line with a circle centered at (-3, 1) with a radius of 2. This involves setting up the equation for the circle and substituting the line's parametric equations. Alternatively, one can calculate the distance between the point (-3, 1) and points along the line, adjusting the parameter t until the distance equals 2. The solution yields the coordinates (3 ± 2 / √5, -1 ± 4/√5). This method effectively demonstrates how to apply geometric principles to solve vector geometry problems.
Student323
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Given the line L: x = (-3, 1) + t(1,-2) find all x on L that lie 2 units from (-3, 1).
Problem: Given the line L: x = (-3, 1) + t(1,-2) find all x on L that lie 2 units from (-3, 1).

I know the answer is (3 ± 2 / √5, -1 ± 4/√5) but I don't know where to start. I found that if t=2, x= (-5, 5) and the normal vector is (2, 1) but I am not sure if this information is useful or how to use it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given a choice of t, can you write down the distance between L(t) and (-3,1)?
 
Student323 said:
Summary:: Given the line L: x = (-3, 1) + t(1,-2) find all x on L that lie 2 units from (-3, 1).

Problem: Given the line L: x = (-3, 1) + t(1,-2) find all x on L that lie 2 units from (-3, 1).

I know the answer is (3 ± 2 / √5, -1 ± 4/√5) but I don't know where to start. I found that if t=2, x= (-5, 5) and the normal vector is (2, 1) but I am not sure if this information is useful or how to use it.
You could intersect the line with a circle around (-3,1) with radius 2. For that set up the equation for the circle and use it for (x,y) on the line.
 
Another way is to step along the line until you get to a point that is ##2## units apart. Calculate the length between ##\binom{-3}{1}## and ##\binom{-3}{1}+t\cdot \binom{1}{-2}## which equals ##2##.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K