Finding the Basis of a Subspace in R^3 with Calculator | Linear Algebra Homework

Click For Summary
To find the basis of a subspace in R^3 spanned by the given sets of vectors, it's essential to determine linear independence among them. For the first set, (4, 4, 8) is a linear combination of (1, 1, 2), indicating that it can be dropped, leaving (1, 1, 2) and (0, 0, 1) as a basis. In the second set, (1, 2, 2) can be expressed as a combination of the other vectors, leading to a similar conclusion about dropping one vector. The rank of both sets is 2, confirming that two vectors can form a basis. Understanding the concepts of linear independence and spanning is crucial for correctly identifying the basis.
_Bd_
Messages
107
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the basis of a subspace of R^3 spanned by S:

1. S = { (4,4,8) (1,1,2) (1,1,1)}
2. S = { (1,2,2) (-1,0,0) (1,1,1)


Homework Equations


Im allowed to use calculator.


The Attempt at a Solution



Im not really sure what this is about. . .I tried the following and got the correct answer on a previous problem. . .but this time it didnt work:

first reduce the matrix to row echelon form which on problem 1 is:
[1 1 2]
[0 0 1]
[0 0 0]
therefore its rank 2 and the basis should be (1, 1, 2) (0, 0, 1) ?
the answer in the back is (1, 1, 0) (0, 0, 1)
I have like no clue as to what to do to get there. . .
so for the second one following the same steps I get
[1 2 2]
[0 1 1]
[0 0 0]
therefore again its rank 2 and . . .well I don't know how to get the basis? trying a guess Id say its (0, 0, 1) and (1, 1, 0)
?? I mean what is that based on? could it maybe be (1, 0, 1) (0, 1, 0) also?



I already re-read the book and just don't understand it. . .
tho people recommended me to not understand linear algebra (yet) and just follow steps. . .but still how do I get there?

-thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What the people recommended is complete nonsense. This is always much easier if you think about it.

For example, in your first set of vectors, is there one which is a linear combination of the others (or another one)?
 
On the first one: if R_{i} is the ith row, then puit R_{1}-2R_{2}\rightarrow R_{1}
 
A basis for a vector space has two properties- it spans the space and its vectors are linearly independent. You are given that these vectors span the space. Are they linearly independent? If so the entire set is already a basis. If not, then one of them can be written as a linear combination of the others and can be dropped from the set. Now check to see if this new set is linearly independent. If so, it is a basis. If not, you can drop another vector.

For (1) you might note that (4, 4, 8)= 4(1, 1, 2).

For (2), (1,2,2)= 2(1,1,1)+ (-1,0,0).
 
HallsofIvy said:
A basis for a vector space has two properties- it spans the space and its vectors are linearly independent. You are given that these vectors span the space. Are they linearly independent? If so the entire set is already a basis. If not, then one of them can be written as a linear combination of the others and can be dropped from the set. Now check to see if this new set is linearly independent. If so, it is a basis. If not, you can drop another vector.

For (1) you might note that (4, 4, 8)= 4(1, 1, 2).

For (2), (1,2,2)= 2(1,1,1)+ (-1,0,0).

so 1 of each is dropped. . .therefore they are both rank 2.
the thing is, once I determine that they are rank 2 how do I write the basis, I thought it would just be the remaining two vectors (as you said the set would be a basis)
so (according to the book) the first thing is to reduce the matrix to echelon form afterwards you can see if any row is made of zeros (then you can eliminate it as you mentioned since its dependent) the other 2 should form the basis (since they are already reduced) but the answer I got was wrong and that's what I was wondering.

@radou
I think the same way (that its better to understand it) but seriously throughout this semester I've been making it by just following instructions and so far tho I know processes I have no clue as to what they mean or how to apply them. . . I mean I get like the gist of it (most mathermatical terms like linear independence and other stuff) but as to its appliications and stuff most of the tihngs I don't get.

anyways. . .so I already got that both are rank 2 because 1 of the vectors is a linear combination of the other 2 (therefore the ref(A) has a row of zeros). . .but what about the basis? I still don't get it (I mean how to get to the answer in the back of the book)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K