Linear Algebra for Quantum Mechanics (QM) Preparation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for advanced linear algebra texts suitable for preparation in quantum mechanics (QM). Participants share their experiences with linear algebra courses and express concerns about the adequacy of certain texts in covering necessary mathematical concepts for QM.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by R. Shankar, specifically the first chapter, as a good introduction to the mathematical concepts relevant to QM.
  • Another participant recommends Axler's text for its early introduction of linear transformations/operators, criticizing other texts like Anton's for delaying this topic.
  • Concerns are raised about physics texts that attempt to teach mathematics, with one participant expressing skepticism about their thoroughness and potential for missing important concepts.
  • A participant mentions their prior knowledge of infinite-dimensional vector spaces and specific matrix properties, indicating a desire for more advanced material.
  • Suggestions for alternative resources include a math methods book and Dirac's book, which is noted for its focus on Kets and Bras algebra.
  • A link to an arXiv paper is provided as a potential resource for further reading.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the adequacy of various texts for learning linear algebra in the context of QM. There is no consensus on a single recommended text, as some participants favor specific books while others remain critical of physics-oriented texts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their previous linear algebra courses, particularly regarding the depth of topics covered, such as infinite-dimensional vector spaces and specific matrix types. These limitations inform their recommendations and requests for more thorough resources.

Who May Find This Useful

Students preparing for quantum mechanics who seek to strengthen their understanding of linear algebra, particularly those looking for advanced texts or alternative resources beyond standard physics textbooks.

ralqs
Messages
97
Reaction score
1
I just finished a course on linear algebra. The class was quite slow, and not much material was covered (essentially going as far as diagonalization w/ some applications). Seeing as I will be taking a QM course next semester, I thought that it might be a good idea to advance myself on the math behind QM over the summer. Could someone recommend a suitable advanced linear algebra text that would be appropriate for QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ralqs said:
I just finished a course on linear algebra. The class was quite slow, and not much material was covered (essentially going as far as diagonalization w/ some applications). Seeing as I will be taking a QM course next semester, I thought that it might be a good idea to advance myself on the math behind QM over the summer. Could someone recommend a suitable advanced linear algebra text that would be appropriate for QM?

Try the first chapter of "Principles of Quantum Mechanics - R. Shankar" called Mathematical introduction,and you will know exactly what you are going to learn
 
I think Axler is excellent for QM. You should stay away from books that delay the introduction of linear transformations/operators instead of introducing them early. For example, Anton defines them around page 300, which is just ridiculous. Make sure you understand the relationship between linear operators and matrices (i.e. this) perfectly.
 
totentanz said:
Try the first chapter of "Principles of Quantum Mechanics - R. Shankar" called Mathematical introduction,and you will know exactly what you are going to learn
I skimmed through it, and although it seems good, I'm always a little suspect of physics texts that try to teach math. My experience is that they are generally rushed, and important ideas and concepts are missed in the process. Would you happen to know a book exclusively dedicated to the same topics, but more thorough?



Fredrik said:
I think Axler is excellent for QM. You should stay away from books that delay the introduction of linear transformations/operators instead of introducing them early. For example, Anton defines them around page 300, which is just ridiculous. Make sure you understand the relationship between linear operators and matrices (i.e. this) perfectly.
That stuff I know already. My linear prof had promised, in the beginning of the course, to discuss infinite-dimensional vector spaces, as well as certain types of matrices and their properties (ie hermitean, adjoint, etc.)
 
ralqs said:
I skimmed through it, and although it seems good, I'm always a little suspect of physics texts that try to teach math. My experience is that they are generally rushed, and important ideas and concepts are missed in the process. Would you happen to know a book exclusively dedicated to the same topics, but more thorough?

The book by https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486453278/?tag=pfamazon01-20 may be what you're looking for. At least you'll find links to many similar books on that page.

You could also try a math methods book like https://www.amazon.com/dp/048667164X/?tag=pfamazon01-20.

Or the many books aimed at https://www.amazon.com/dp/048667164X/?tag=pfamazon01-20.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ralqs said:
I skimmed through it, and although it seems good, I'm always a little suspect of physics texts that try to teach math. My experience is that they are generally rushed, and important ideas and concepts are missed in the process. Would you happen to know a book exclusively dedicated to the same topics, but more thorough?




That stuff I know already. My linear prof had promised, in the beginning of the course, to discuss infinite-dimensional vector spaces, as well as certain types of matrices and their properties (ie hermitean, adjoint, etc.)

So try Dirac's book...I think in QM you will ned most Kets and Bras Algabra
 
ralqs said:
I skimmed through it, and although it seems good, I'm always a little suspect of physics texts that try to teach math. My experience is that they are generally rushed, and important ideas and concepts are missed in the process. Would you happen to know a book exclusively dedicated to the same topics, but more thorough?

Try http://de.arxiv.org/abs/0810.1019
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K