Linear Algebra General Solution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the general solution to the linear system defined by the equations ax + by = 1 and cx + dy = 2, under the condition that ad - bc ≠ 0. The user attempts to manipulate the equations by multiplying and subtracting them, leading to the expression (ad - bc)y = 2a - c. It is established that the unique solution exists due to the non-zero determinant condition, allowing for the calculation of y as y = (2a - c) / (ad - bc). Substituting this value back into the original equations simplifies the process of finding x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear equations and systems
  • Familiarity with determinants in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of matrix operations and manipulations
  • Ability to perform algebraic substitutions and simplifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in linear algebra
  • Learn about matrix inversion techniques for solving linear systems
  • Explore methods for simplifying algebraic expressions
  • Investigate the implications of the condition ad - bc ≠ 0 in linear systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching systems of equations, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix theory and solution methods for linear systems.

Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the general solution to the system:
ax+ by= 1
cx+ dy= 2

Consider the case when
ad- bc \neq 0

The attempt at a solution
Like in my other post, I multiplied the first equation by "c" and the second equation by "a", and then I subtracted the two equations. I just seem to be stuck.

I got the following matrix:
0...ad- bc...2a- c
ac...ad...2a

Therefore, (ad- bc)y= 2a- c
But what relation can I deduce from this equation to help my determine a general solution for the system? The previous question I posted was much more obvious, where I was able to solve y= 0. But this isn't the case. I appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve for y by dividing both sides by ad - bc. You know that it is legitimate to do this because you are told that ad - bc != 0.

Just as before, the general solution is going to be just a single point - a pair of numbers. The reason that a unique solution exists, although it might not seem obvious to you at this point in your studies, is that ad - bc != 0.
 
Mark44 said:
Solve for y by dividing both sides by ad - bc. You know that it is legitimate to do this because you are told that ad - bc != 0.

Just as before, the general solution is going to be just a single point - a pair of numbers. The reason that a unique solution exists, although it might not seem obvious to you at this point in your studies, is that ad - bc != 0.

When I divide both sides by y, I get y= (2a- c)/(ad- bc)
If I substitute this back into either one of the original equations, I get an even more complicated equation. Is there some way to simply it?
 
What you get for x will be no more complicated than what you got for y, at least when it is simplified. Also, you can check your answers by substituting them into your original system of equations. It should be true that ax + by = 1 and cx + dy = 2.
 
When I substitute what I got for y into the first original equation, I get ax= 1- b((2a-c)/(ad-bc))
Can I simplify this?
 
Yes. Get a common denominator and things simplify.

Also, as in the other problem you posted, a and c can't both be zero, due to the restriction that ad - bc != 0.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K