Linear Algebra - Linear Spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining whether the set of increasing functions forms a real linear space under standard operations of addition and scalar multiplication. It is established that increasing functions are closed under addition, as demonstrated by the inequality proofs provided. However, the set fails to be closed under scalar multiplication, particularly when multiplied by negative scalars, which results in a non-increasing function. Therefore, increasing functions do not satisfy all the axioms required for a linear space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically linear spaces.
  • Familiarity with function properties, particularly increasing functions.
  • Knowledge of closure properties in vector spaces.
  • Basic skills in mathematical proof techniques, including inequalities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the axioms of a vector space to understand the requirements for closure under addition and scalar multiplication.
  • Explore examples of other function sets, such as rational functions and Taylor polynomials, to analyze their linear space properties.
  • Learn about the implications of scalar multiplication on function behavior, particularly in relation to monotonicity.
  • Practice proving closure properties with various function types to solidify understanding of linear spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone interested in the properties of function spaces and mathematical proofs.

Mano Jow
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello there,
I'm having some problems with a proof-like exercise on linear algebra. Here's what I'm supposed to do:

Homework Statement


Determine whether each of the given sets is a real linear space, if addition and multiplication by real scalars are defined in the usual way. For those that are not, tell which axioms fail to hold.

Homework Equations


All increasing functions.
(there are others, like rational functions, all Taylor polynomials of degree [tex]\leq[/tex] n, etc. but I guess my doubts are related to all of them).

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, after a couple of attempts my teacher told me that once I prove that increasing functions are a subset of the functions linear space, I just need to prove the closure axioms. This can be done just by saying "the increasing fuctions are contained in the set of functions". Ok, then I started to prove the closure under addtion.

Let f be an increasing funcion, if x1 < x2, then f(x1) < f(x2). The same applies to a increasing function g.
So, adding g(x1) to both sides of the f(x) equation and f(x2) to both sides of the g(x) equation, we have:

(1) f(x1) + g(x1) < f(x2) + g(x1)
(2) g(x1) + f(x2) < g(x2) + f(x2)
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] f(x1) + g(x1) < g(x2) + f(x2)
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] (f+g)(x1) < (f+g)(x2)

And I guess it's proven that it's closed under addition. Is that right?
Now, I know it's not closed under multiplication because if I multiplicate f by -1 it won't be an increasing function anymore. But can I just say that and it's ok or is there another way to show it's not closed under multiplication?

I have tried this (let a be a real number):
f(x1) < f(x2) [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] af(x1) < af(x2) [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] (af)(x1) < (af)(x2). But I don't think I got anything useful.

I'd be very grateful if anyone could help.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mano Jow said:
Hello there,
I'm having some problems with a proof-like exercise on linear algebra. Here's what I'm supposed to do:

Homework Statement


Determine whether each of the given sets is a real linear space, if addition and multiplication by real scalars are defined in the usual way. For those that are not, tell which axioms fail to hold.

Homework Equations


All increasing functions.
(there are others, like rational functions, all Taylor polynomials of degree [tex]\leq[/tex] n, etc. but I guess my doubts are related to all of them).

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, after a couple of attempts my teacher told me that once I prove that increasing functions are a subset of the functions linear space, I just need to prove the closure axioms. This can be done just by saying "the increasing fuctions are contained in the set of functions". Ok, then I started to prove the closure under addtion.

Let f be an increasing funcion, if x1 < x2, then f(x1) < f(x2). The same applies to a increasing function g.
So, adding g(x1) to both sides of the f(x) equation and f(x2) to both sides of the g(x) equation, we have:

(1) f(x1) + g(x1) < f(x2) + g(x1)
Since g(x1) < g(x2), you can continue the inequality above with < f(x2) + g(x2).

This shows that f(x1) + g(x1) < f(x2) + g(x2), or
(f + g)(x1) < (f + g)(x2), and you're done with that part.
Mano Jow said:
(2) g(x1) + f(x2) < g(x2) + f(x2)
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] f(x1) + g(x1) < g(x2) + f(x2)
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] (f+g)(x1) < (f+g)(x2)

And I guess it's proven that it's closed under addition. Is that right?
Now, I know it's not closed under multiplication because if I multiplicate f by -1 it won't be an increasing function anymore. But can I just say that and it's ok or is there another way to show it's not closed under multiplication?
This is enough to show that the set of increasing functions is not closed under scalar multiplication.
Mano Jow said:
I have tried this (let a be a real number):
f(x1) < f(x2) [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] af(x1) < af(x2) [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] (af)(x1) < (af)(x2). But I don't think I got anything useful.

I'd be very grateful if anyone could help.
Thanks in advance.
 
Thanks a lot for the fast reply!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K