Linear Algebra: Linearity of inner product

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the linearity of the inner product in the context of vector spaces, particularly focusing on whether it is linear in both components. Participants are examining the properties of inner products, especially in relation to complex vector spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to demonstrate the linearity of the inner product for both components, questioning the validity of their reasoning and the definitions involved. Some express confusion about the implications of conjugate linearity in the second component.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the inner product and its properties. Questions about the specific vector space and definitions being used have been raised, indicating a productive examination of assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the specific vector space and the definition of the inner product being referenced. Participants note that the vectors may belong to a complex space, but the exact context remains unspecified.

teddyayalew
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An inner product is linear in both components.

Homework Equations


<x,y> = <conjugate(y),conjugate(x)>
<x+y,z> = <x,z> +<y,z>


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was true . It is obvious that it is linear for the first component by definition
Attempt to show it is for second component:

<x,y+z> = <conjugate(y+z),conjugate(x)>
=<conjugate(y),conjugate(x)> + <conjugate(z),conjugate(x)>
= <x,y> + <x,y>


But the answer is false. I am having trouble understanding why it is not linear in both components. The answer key says that the second component is conjugate- linear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teddyayalew said:

Homework Statement


An inner product is linear in both components.

Homework Equations


<x,y> = <conjugate(y),conjugate(x)>
<x+y,z> = <x,z> +<y,z>


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was true . It is obvious that it is linear for the first component by definition
Attempt to show it is for second component:

<x,y+z> = <conjugate(y+z),conjugate(x)>
=<conjugate(y),conjugate(x)> + <conjugate(z),conjugate(x)>
= <x,y> + <x,y>


But the answer is false. I am having trouble understanding why it is not linear in both components. The answer key says that the second component is conjugate- linear.

What is the vector space you are working in? What is the relevant definition of inner product?

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't say which space. It was just a true or false statement, but I know that the entries of the vectors can be from the complex space. And it doesn't tell me which definition of the inner product but I believe it is the standard inner product.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
teddyayalew said:
It doesn't say which space. It was just a true or false statement, but I know that the entries of the vectors can be from the complex space. And it doesn't tell me which definition of the inner product but I believe it is the standard inner product.

In your OP YOU said "It is obvious that it is linear for the first component by definition", implying that you had some definition in mind--otherwise, why use the word 'definition'? So, are you now saying that is not true?

If we assume you are speaking of C^n with &lt;x,y&gt; = \sum_{i=1}^n \bar{x_i} y_i, it is definitely linear in both x and y. Your "equation"
&lt;\text{conjugate}(y),\text{conjugate}(x)&gt; = &lt;x,y&gt; is false, if by "conjugate" you mean "complex conjugate". It is not even true in one dimension, with &lt;x,y&gt; = \bar{y}x.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K