Linear Algebra: Mapping Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mapping defined by F: R² → R², where F(x, y) = (xy, y), specifically analyzing the image of the line x = 2. The image is determined to be the line described by the equation y = 2x. The participants clarify that for any point (2, y) on the line x = 2, the transformation yields (2y, y), which indeed lies on the line y = 2x. The confusion arises from the notation used in the solution, particularly regarding the relationship between the coordinates and the interpretation of the mapping.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear mappings in R²
  • Familiarity with the concept of image and pre-image in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of coordinate systems and graphing linear equations
  • Basic proficiency in interpreting mathematical notation and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in R²
  • Learn about the concept of image and kernel in linear algebra
  • Explore the implications of mapping functions on geometric figures
  • Review examples of linear mappings and their graphical representations
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in understanding linear mappings and their geometric interpretations.

srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



From Serge Lang's "Linear Algebra, 3rd Edition", pg 51 exercise 9.

Prove that the image is equal to a certain set S by proving that the image is contained in S, and also that every element of S in in the image.

9. Let F:R2→R2 be the mapping defined by F(x,y)=(xy,y). Describe the image under F of the straight line x=2.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

I first simply drew out a vertical line of x=2 and applied F to (2,y) for various values of y.
F(2,0)=(0,0)
F(2,1)=(2,1)
F(2,2)=(4,2).

I noticed it seemed to form a line which could be described by y=(1/2)x .

I got a little stuck and looked at the answer and to my surprise the image was a line with slope 2.Below is the answer, and I just don't understand it...

SOLUTION The image of F is the line whose equation is y=2x. Indeed, if (2,y) belongs to the line x=2, then F(2,y)=(2y,y), and clearly (2y,y) belongs to the line y=2x. Conversely, suppose v=2u; then F(2,v/2)=(v,v/2)=(v,u).
I don't see why "clearly (2y,y) belongs to the line y=2x". If x is twice y in that tuple, wouldn't the equation be x=2y, or equivalently y=x/2 ?The other part I partly understand. I see why F(2,v/2)=(v,u) after applying the transformation, but I don't understand the significance of using v and u and setting up the equation v=2u.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are right. It appears to be an error in the solution, or at the very least an ambiguous use of notation. By convention, when you're dealing with \mathbb{R}^2, you always consider the first coordinate to be the ''horizontal'' coordinate. I would agree with you when you say that the set of points (2y,y), for all values of y, belongs to the line y=2x, where y is the vertical axis and x is the horizontal axis.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K