MHB Linear Approximation (Need someone to check my work)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using linear approximation to estimate the value of √100.4. The initial calculation yielded 10.20, but a mistake was identified in the multiplication of the fraction, where 1/20 was incorrectly calculated as 0.05 instead of 0.02. The correct approximation was determined to be 10.02, as verified by squaring the result to check accuracy. The participants emphasized the importance of correctly counting decimal places in multiplication. The final conclusion confirms that 10.02 is indeed the accurate approximation for √100.4.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Use a linear approximation to find a good approximation to $$\sqrt{100.4}$$

$$x = 100.4$$
$$x1 = 100$$
$$y1 = 10$$

$$y - 10 = \frac{1}{20}(100.4 - 100) $$

$$y = 10.20 $$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shamieh said:
Use a linear approximation to find a good approximation to $$\sqrt{100.4}$$

$$x = 100.4$$
$$x1 = 100$$
$$y1 = 10$$

$$y - 10 = \frac{1}{20}(100.4 - 100) $$

$$y = 10.20 $$

Looks correct... except for a small calculation mistake.
Did you check what $10.20^2$ is?
That should immediately reveal the mistake.
 
I like Serena said:
Looks correct... except for a small calculation mistake.
Did you check what $10.20^2$ is?
That should immediately reveal the mistake.

its 104.04 but I don't understand where I went wrong. Why can't I say 1/20 = .05 and then say .05 * .4 = .20, then finally 10 + .20 = 10.20 ?
 
shamieh said:
its 104.04 but I don't understand where I went wrong. Why can't I say 1/20 = .05 and then say .05 * .4 = .20, then finally 10 + .20 = 10.20 ?

As you can see your fraction is off by a factor of 10.
Indeed .05 * .4 ≠ .20.
Instead .05 * .4 = .020.

The trick is to count the number of digits after the decimal point.
.05 has 2 digits, .4 has 1 digit, therefore their product (5 x 4 = 20) must have 2+1=3 digits after the decimal point (0.020).
 
10.02 is the correct answer then correct?
 
shamieh said:
10.02 is the correct answer then correct?

Let's see:
$$10.02^2 = (10 + 0.02)^2 = 10^2 + 2 \cdot 10 \cdot 0.02 + 0.02^2 = 100 + 0.4 + 0.0004 = 100.4004$$
Yep. I'd say that's the correct answer.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K