Linear Impulse and Momentum Question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter whateverhello
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Linear Momentum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of linear impulse and momentum in the context of a bullet impacting a block at rest on an incline. Participants explore the implications of impulse during the collision, the assumptions made in momentum conservation, and the role of external forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the impulse is considered to be zero in the context of the bullet-block collision, suggesting that the x-component of gravity should be taken into account due to the incline.
  • Another participant asserts that the impulse is zero because the block is at rest, prompting requests for clarification on this point.
  • Some participants explain that in collisions, it is often assumed that external forces are negligible due to the short duration of the collision, allowing for the use of momentum conservation.
  • There is a discussion about whether the assumption of zero impulse is necessary, with some suggesting that knowing the duration of the collision would be required to account for it.
  • One participant introduces the concept of impulsive versus non-impulsive forces, questioning how normal forces would factor into the impulse equation if the block were constrained against a wall.
  • Another participant clarifies that the zero in the momentum equation refers to the initial momentum of the block at rest, while another challenges this by stating it pertains to the impulse of external forces.
  • One participant argues that the net impulse acting on the system is zero due to equal and opposite impulses acting on the bullet and block, while noting the effects of the normal force in the perpendicular direction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of impulse during the collision, with some asserting it is zero while others argue against this assumption. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the treatment of impulse and the role of external forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for clarity on the duration of the collision and the definitions of impulsive versus non-impulsive forces, indicating that these factors influence the discussion but remain unresolved.

whateverhello
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
For example, consider a bullet (moving horizontally) that impacts a block (at rest) on an incline.

From what I know,
momentum1 + impulse = momentum2

I have the solution to the problem, and it says (for the impact),
(mass of bullet)(speed of bullet) + 0 = (mass of bullet+block)(speed of bullet+block)



I don't understand why the impulse is 0 though. According to the video above, which poses a similar problem, he says since we're talking x-direction, no need to worry about the gravity, and normal forces. But in this problem, since it's on an incline, shouldn't the x-component of the gravity be considered? (Note, the positive x-direction is taken to be along the ramp, so gravity considered would be mgsinθ. Is it because the impact time is so minuscule that FΔt = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whateverhello said:
block (at rest) ...I don't understand why the impulse is 0
Because the block is at rest.
 
A.T. said:
Because the block is at rest.
Can someone elaborate on what he means, thanks. Judging from his reply, I must be missing something very basic here. This impulse stuff in general is giving me problems.
 
Last edited:
When we study collisions, in the first approximation it is assumed that the system of colliding objects is isolated, i.e. the resultant of the external forces is zero. In tehse conditions we can use conservation of momentum.
The reason this assumption works pretty well in many real situations is that the collision time is very short so that the impulse of external forces is very small when compared with the impulse of the large collision forces.

You don't have to assume zero impulse. But then you will need to know the duration of collision to count it in.
 
nasu said:
When we study collisions, in the first approximation it is assumed that the system of colliding objects is isolated, i.e. the resultant of the external forces is zero. In tehse conditions we can use conservation of momentum.
The reason this assumption works pretty well in many real situations is that the collision time is very short so that the impulse of external forces is very small when compared with the impulse of the large collision forces.

You don't have to assume zero impulse. But then you will need to know the duration of collision to count it in.
Ahhhhh, ok. So this is where whether a force is impulsive or non-impulsive comes into play right? Follow-up question, so I know weight and spring forces are non-impulsive, but what about normal forces? For example if the block were pushed up against a wall so that it won't move no matter what, how would the impulse equation look like?
 
whateverhello said:
Can someone elaborate on what he means, thanks.
The 0 in your solution is the initial momentum of the block at rest.
 
A.T. said:
The 0 in your solution is the initial momentum of the block at rest.
Uhhh no? It's the impulse of the external forces.
 
whateverhello said:
Uhhh no? It's the impulse of the external forces.
It could be either, but if that's what the solution says.
 
whateverhello said:
I don't understand why the impulse is 0 though.

Hey man,
the impulse is not zero !
two impulses of equal magnitudes are acting in opposite directions ,on the bullet and another on the block, so net impulse acting on the system is zero !
[BUT MIND THAT - I'm only talking about the situation for the direction along the incline , for direction perpendicular to it the normal force exerted on the bullet by the incline will destroy the corresponding component of the velocity of that bullet ! ]

I'm assuming that the incline is fixed
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K