Linear Independence in R-Vector Space and Z_2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of linear independence in vector spaces, specifically comparing properties in real vector spaces and those over the field Z_2. Participants explore the implications of changing the underlying field on the independence of vector sums.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the conditions under which sums of vectors remain linearly independent, questioning the validity of statements regarding vector independence in different fields.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of definitions and properties related to vector spaces over different fields. Some participants have acknowledged misunderstandings and clarified their positions, while others continue to question the implications of using Z_2 as a field.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the distinction between vector spaces and modules, particularly in the context of Z_2, and the impact of field characteristics on linear independence. There is an ongoing debate about the correctness of initial statements regarding vector sums.

Treadstone 71
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
If a,b,c are vectors in an R-vector space then their sums a+b, a+c, b+c are also linearly independent. If R is replaced by Z_2 then this fails, because there's the nontrivial solution to

x(a+b)+y(a+c)+z(b+c)=0

where x=y=z=0 or x=y=z=1

right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x(a+b)+y(a+c)+z(b+c)=0 implies that (x+y)a+(x+z)b+(y+z)c=0 so put X=x+y, Y=x+z, and Z=y+z to yield Xa+Yb+Zc=0, which has only the trivial solution as a, b, and c are linearly independent.

I don't get what is meant by Z_2, an integer lattice?
 
No, the field with two elements, so 1+1=0, so of course (x+y)+(y+z)+(z+x)=0 so the three vectors are linearly dependent irrespective of whether x,y,z are.
 
As worded this makes no sense!
"If a,b,c are vectors in an R-vector space then their sums a+b, a+c, b+c are also linearly independent."
No, that's not true. For example is a= b= c= <1, 0, 0> then a+ b= <2, 0, 0>, a+ c= <2, 0, 0> and b+ c= <2, 0, 0>. Of course, the word "also" in the conclusion indicates that you intended to say:
"If a,b,c are independent vectors in an R-vector space then their sums a+b, a+c, b+c are also linearly independent." which is true.

Strictly speaking, you can't say just "If R is replaced by Z_2" (the integers modulo 2) since that could not be a vector space- it would be a "module". However, your statement is correct: even if a, b, c are independent if the module over Z_2, then a+b, b+c, and a+c are not independent.

Shear non-sense!: As JasonRox pointed out Z_2 is a field (of characteristic 2) not an integral domain so this really is a vector space!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
As worded this makes no sense!
"If a,b,c are vectors in an R-vector space then their sums a+b, a+c, b+c are also linearly independent."
No, that's not true. For example is a= b= c= <1, 0, 0> then a+ b= <2, 0, 0>, a+ c= <2, 0, 0> and b+ c= <2, 0, 0>. Of course, the word "also" in the conclusion indicates that you intended to say:
"If a,b,c are independent vectors in an R-vector space then their sums a+b, a+c, b+c are also linearly independent." which is true.
Strictly speaking, you can't say just "If R is replaced by Z_2" (the integers modulo 2) since that could not be a vector space- it would be a "module". However, your statement is correct: even if a, b, c are independent if the module over Z_2, then a+b, b+c, and a+c are not independent.

The statement is true for all fields except for those fields that are of characteristic equal to two.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Of course, the word "also" in the conclusion indicates that you intended to say:

Yes, that was I intended to say.

HallsofIvy said:
Strictly speaking, you can't say just "If R is replaced by Z_2" (the integers modulo 2) since that could not be a vector space- it would be a "module". However, your statement is correct: even if a, b, c are independent if the module over Z_2, then a+b, b+c, and a+c are not independent.
Shear non-sense!: As JasonRox pointed out Z_2 is a field (of characteristic 2) not an integral domain so this really is a vector space!

I have no idea what you are talking about. Z_2 and R are both fields as far as I know, and vector spaces are defined over fields.
 
Yes, re-read my post. I edited it to admit that I was wrong after JaxonRox pointed it out to me.
 
Treadstone 71 said:
Yes, that was I intended to say.



I have no idea what you are talking about. Z_2 and R are both fields as far as I know, and vector spaces are defined over fields.

Yes, they are both fields, but that doesn't mean you can just replace R with Z_2 to create another vector space with the same properties.

Maybe the following will show how the "simplest" things change when you change fields.

The dimension for the vector space R over the field R is what?

Now, what is the dimension for the vector space R over the field Q (Rationals)?

Completely different answers.

The statement you said is true for all vector spaces except those who are over fields of characteristic 2. Sure it fails for a particular field, but that doesn't mean the statement isn't true.
 
Excellent. Got it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K