Linear independence of the set of exponential functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the linear independence of the set of exponential functions defined as \( f_n(x) = e^{nx} \) for \( n \in \mathbb{N} \). The user suggests a method for \( n=2 \) by evaluating the functions at specific points, but seeks a general proof for arbitrary \( n \). The consideration of the Wronskian as a potential tool for this proof is mentioned, indicating its complexity. The key conclusion is that a systematic approach involving differentiation and the properties of the Wronskian is necessary for a comprehensive proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of the Wronskian determinant and its application in linear algebra
  • Basic calculus concepts, including differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Wronskian in the context of linear independence
  • Learn how to apply differentiation to establish relationships between functions
  • Explore proofs of linear independence for other function sets
  • Investigate the implications of linear independence in functional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in linear algebra, functional analysis, and the properties of exponential functions.

Monocles
Messages
463
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For each [tex]n \in \mathbb{N},[/tex] let [tex]f_n(x) = e^{nx}[/tex] for [tex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]. Prove that [tex]f_1, ... , f_n[/tex] are linearly independent vectors in [tex]{\cal F}(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the simple way to prove this for n=2 would be by setting x to 0 and 1 and showing that c_1 and c_2 must be 0 with two simultaneous equations. However I don't know how to generalize that to an arbitrary n. I considered making a generalized Wronskian, but I think that would get sloppy and confusing very quickly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens when you differentiate both sides of

[tex]c_1 f_1 + \cdots + c_n f_n = 0?[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K