Linear Transformations - formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the matrix A for a linear transformation T defined by T(x) = Ax, using given input-output pairs. The user constructs a matrix equation from the provided vectors and their transformations, resulting in A multiplied by a matrix of column vectors equating to a matrix of their transformations. The user seeks clarification on the validity of combining these matrices, which is justified by the properties of matrix multiplication. The correct matrix A can be derived from the established relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations and their representation as matrix equations.
  • Familiarity with matrix multiplication and its properties.
  • Knowledge of column vectors and their role in linear algebra.
  • Basic skills in solving matrix equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in depth.
  • Learn about matrix multiplication and its implications in linear algebra.
  • Explore methods for solving systems of linear equations using matrices.
  • Investigate the concept of vector spaces and their applications in transformations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, as well as educators teaching linear transformations and matrix theory.

notmuch
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am given the following:

T([1,2,-3]) = [1,0,4,2]
T([3,5,2]) = [-8,3,0,1]
T([-2,-3,-4]) = [0,2,-1,0]

And of course I know that:

T(x) = Ax

and I want to find the matrix A.

So, from the individual equations, I construct:

A[1, 2, -3] = [1, 0, 4, 2] (please forgive, these are actually col. vectors)

I do something similar for the other two, and come up with the equation below. I can solve this equation to obtain (the correct) matrix A, but I can't seem to find an explanation for why it is possible to throw it all together into "combined matrices." Could anyone help? Thanks!

<br /> A\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 3 &amp; -2\\<br /> 2 &amp; 5 &amp; -3\\<br /> -3 &amp; 2 &amp; -4\end{pmatrix} = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; -8 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 2\\<br /> 4 &amp; 0 &amp; -1\\<br /> 2 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\end{pmatrix} <br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the last matrix is equivalent to the three individual equations. This just follows from matrix multiplication. Schematically, if the v_n's are column vectors, you can write:

A\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> v_1 &amp; v_2 &amp; v_3 &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \end{array}\right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> Av_1 &amp; Av_2 &amp; Av_3 &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vert &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \end{array}\right)
 
Got it. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K