Linear Transformations: Proofs and Examples for R^2 to R^2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining whether a specific mapping L: R^2 → R^2 defined by L(x1, x2) = (2x1 + 3x2, 0) is a linear transformation. The proof involves verifying two key properties: L(x + y) = L(x) + L(y) and L(cx) = cL(x), where x and y are vectors in R^2 and c is a scalar. The user correctly demonstrates that both properties hold, confirming that the mapping is indeed a linear transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with vector addition and scalar multiplication
  • Knowledge of R^2 and its representation as ordered pairs
  • Ability to construct proofs in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in greater depth
  • Explore examples of linear transformations beyond R^2
  • Learn about the kernel and image of linear transformations
  • Investigate the implications of linear transformations in higher dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians exploring vector spaces, and anyone seeking to understand the fundamentals of linear transformations.

karnten07
Messages
206
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Linear transformations

Homework Statement



Determine whether the following maps are linear transformations. (proofs or counterexamples required)

a.) L: R^2\rightarrowR^2,

(x1)
(x2)
\mapsto
(2x1 + 3x2)
(0)

The brackets should be two large brackets surrounding the two vectors.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been reading about linear transformations and i know i have to show something like:

L(x1+x2)= L(x1) +L(x2) and L(cx1)= cL(x1) where c is a scalar.

Is this right and i should treat x1 and x2 separately rather than the vector including x1 and x2 as one element of R^2?

What I am trying to say is, do i need to define a vector (y1, y2) as well in the set of R^2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For x,y \inR^2,

x=(x1,x2) and y= (y1,y2)

x+y=(x1,x2)+(y1,y2)= (x1+y1, x2+y2)
L(x+y) = L(x1+y1, x2+y2)
=2(x1+y1)+3(x2+y2)
=(2x1+3x2)+(2y1+3y2)
=L(x) +L(y)

Is this right for the first part?

Then because cx= c(x1,x2) = (cx1,cx2) you have
L(cx) = L(cx1, cx2) = (2cx1 + 3cx2)
=c(2x1 + 3x2)
=cL(x)

I think I'm understanding it more now, if this is right that is.
 
That's right. I think you've got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K