Linearized Einstein Field Equations

  • Thread starter PLuz
  • Start date
  • #1
PLuz
64
0
Hi everyone,

Say that one can separate the metric of a space time in a background metric and a small perturbation such that [itex]g_{\alpha \beta}=g'_{\alpha \beta}+h_{\alpha \beta}[/itex], where [itex]g'_{\alpha \beta}[/itex] is the background metric and [itex]h_{\alpha \beta}[/itex] the perturbation.

Computing the christoffel symbols one would get, to first order in the perturbation: [tex]\Gamma^\alpha_{\beta \gamma}=\Gamma'^\alpha_{\beta \gamma}+\frac{1}{2}(h^{\alpha}_{\beta,\gamma}+h^{ \alpha }_{\gamma,\beta}-h_{\beta \gamma}\hspace{.2mm}^{,\alpha}),[/tex]

right?
Then why, in http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2011-7/fulltext.html reference, in the text right after Eq.19.23, [itex]C^\alpha_{\beta \gamma}=\frac{1}{2}(h^{\alpha}_{\beta;\gamma}+h^{ \alpha }_{\gamma;\beta}-h_{\beta \gamma}\hspace{.2mm}^{;\alpha})[/itex], is written with covariant derivatives?


Thank you
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,640
1,107
A difference between two connections is a tensor, which can be checked by explicitly writing down the transformation of this difference. Hence you'll need covariant derivatives, not partial derivatives. Of course, these covariant derivatives should follow from your definition of the connection and your C.

So that is something which you should do first. Second, you should be very careful with lowering and raising indices underneath partial derivatives.
 
  • #3
PLuz
64
0
Yes, you're absolutely right, at both things. I didn't care about the partial derivative when I raised my indexes and indeed I was being naive in the definition of C.

Thank you very much you were a life (brain) saver!
 

Suggested for: Linearized Einstein Field Equations

Replies
10
Views
350
Replies
57
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
509
Replies
186
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
418
  • Last Post
2
Replies
52
Views
970
Replies
4
Views
920
Replies
16
Views
930
Top