Linearizing a differential equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
eep
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
This question popped up while trying to solve problem 7.41 from Taylor's Classical Mechanics book.

Basically we have the differential equation

[tex](1+4k^2\rho^2)\ddot{\rho} = \rho \omega^2 - 4k^2\rho{\dot{\rho}}^2-2gk\rho[/tex]

and we are looking if the equilibrium position [tex]\rho = 0[/tex] is stable.

After "linearizing" this you are supposed to end up with

[tex]\ddot{\rho} = (\omega^2 - 2gk)\rho[/tex]

but I really don't understand the correct way to arrive at this. Particularly, how are you supposed to justify dropping the [tex]4k^2\rho{\dot{\rho}}^2[/tex] term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eep said:
This question popped up while trying to solve problem 7.41 from Taylor's Classical Mechanics book.

Basically we have the differential equation

[tex](1+4k^2\rho^2)\ddot{\rho} = \rho \omega^2 - 4k^2\rho{\dot{\rho}}^2-2gk\rho[/tex]

and we are looking if the equilibrium position [tex]\rho = 0[/tex] is stable.

After "linearizing" this you are supposed to end up with

[tex]\ddot{\rho} = (\omega^2 - 2gk)\rho[/tex]

but I really don't understand the correct way to arrive at this. Particularly, how are you supposed to justify dropping the [tex]4k^2\rho{\dot{\rho}}^2[/tex] term?
My guess is that at the equilibrium position, ρ ≈ 0, and [itex]\dot{\rho}[/itex] is either zero or close to it, which would make [itex]\dot{\rho}^2[/itex] negligible.