Linearly independent set in a vector space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that a specific set of vectors derived from a linearly independent set in a vector space remains linearly independent. The original poster presents a set of vectors formed by linear combinations of three distinct vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a relationship between the coefficients of the vectors and sets up a system of equations based on linear combinations. Some participants discuss the implications of the coefficients being equal to zero and question the correctness of the derived equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of their equations and checking for correctness. There is a focus on the relationships between the coefficients and the conditions for linear independence, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the vectors involved must be distinct and non-zero, which is a critical assumption in their reasoning. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the coefficients used in the equations.

AkilMAI
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to prove that, if {u;v;w} is a linearly independent set in a
vector space, then the set
{2u + v + w; u + 2v + w; u + v + 2w}
is also linearly independent.



Homework Equations


...


The Attempt at a Solution


if {u;v;w} is a linearly independent set=> c1*u +c2*v+c3*w=0 and c1=c2=c3=0 and also u,v,w are distinct and different from 0.
=>c1(2u + v + w)+ c2(u + 2v + w)+ c3(u + v + 2w)=0,but if I create a system of equations based on this i get u=v=w=0...any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From this upper equation you get a system of equations involving the coefficients c1, c2, c3. This system yields a solution c1 = c2 = c3 = 0. This, in turn, implies what you need to show.

Edit: but note that the c's are not the same as in the upper equation - your equation contains coefficients which are sums of the c's.
 
writing u(2c1+c2+c3)+v(c1+2c2+c3)+w(c1+c2+2c3)=0...and by definition u v and w have to be distinct and different from 0.=>2c1+c2+c3=0,c1+2c2+c3=0,c1+c2+2c3=0...calculating this system of equations and i get c1=c2=c3=0...is this correct?
 
AkilMAI said:
writing u(2c1+c2+c3)+v(c1+2c2+c3)+w(c1+c2+2c3)=0...and by definition u v and w have to be distinct and different from 0.=>2c1+c2+c3=0,c1+2c2+c3=0,c1+c2+2c3=0...calculating this system of equations and i get c1=c2=c3=0...is this correct?

Yes. And the important thing is that c1 = c2 = c3 = 0 implies 2c1 + c2 + c3 = 0, c1 + 2c2 + c3 = 0 and c1 + c2 + 2c3 = 0, which is exactly what you need to show.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K