Link between Pascal's triangle and integrals of trigonometric functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the connection between Pascal's triangle and the evaluation of trigonometric integrals, particularly focusing on integrals of the form \(\int_0^{2\pi} \sin^n(t) dt\). Participants explore various methods for simplifying these integrals and the potential role of Pascal's triangle in these simplifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the lecturer's method of simplifying \(\int_0^{2\pi} \sin^4(t) dt\) and its connection to Pascal's triangle.
  • Another participant suggests expressing powers of sine in terms of cosine using double angle identities, leading to a detailed expansion of \(\sin^4(t)\) and its integral.
  • A correction is made regarding the integration result, with a participant asserting that the integral evaluates to \(3/8\), aligning with the lecturer's answer.
  • Some participants propose that the lecturer might be using complex exponentials to express trigonometric functions, indicating that Pascal's triangle could assist in expanding these expressions.
  • A later reply introduces a recurrence relation for the integral of sine powers, leading to a formula that connects the integral to binomial coefficients, which are related to Pascal's triangle.
  • Another participant suggests a refined approach using complex exponentials, indicating a preference for a method that simplifies the conversion back to trigonometric functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and interpretations regarding the connection between Pascal's triangle and trigonometric integrals. There is no consensus on a single method or interpretation, and multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the methods used for integration and the definitions of trigonometric identities. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly in the context of the recurrence relation and its implications for different values of \(n\).

zass
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
My lecturer keeps simplifying trigonometric integrals in one line such as
[tex]\int^{2\pi}_{0}sin^{4}(t)dt=\frac{3\pi}{4}[/tex]
and writes pascals triangle next to it. Just wondering what's the link between them? I'm sure it's obvious and easy, I'd just like to have an fast way of dealing with these
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what your teacher is doing! However you can express powers of sin(x) in terms of things like sin(4x). The "double angle identity", [itex]cos(2x)= cos^2(x)- sin^2(x)[/itex] can be rewritten as [itex]cos(2x)= cos^2(x)- (1- cos^2(x))= 2cos^2(x)- 1[/itex] or as [itex]cos(2x)= (1- sin^2(x))- sin^2(x)= 1- 2sin^2(x)[/itex].

Those can be "solved" as [itex]cos^2(x)= (1/2)(1+ cos(2x))[/itex] and [itex]sin^2(x)= (1/2)(1- cos(2x))[/itex].

So sin4(x)= (sin2(x))2= ((1/2)(1- cos(2x))2[/itex][itex]= (1/4)(1- 2cos(2x)+ cos^2(2x))[/itex]. And [itex]cos^2(2x)= (1/2)(1+ cos(2(2x)))= (1/2)(1+ cos(4x)[/itex] so
[itex]sin^4(x)= 1/4- (1/2)cos(2x)+ (1/2)(1+ cos(4x))[/itex][itex]= 3/4- (1/2)cos(2x)+ (1/2)cos(4x)[/itex].

Since the integrals of cos(2x) and cos(4x), from 0 to [itex]2\pi[/itex], are 0, the only thing remaining is that "1/4" and its integral from 0 to [itex]2\pi[/itex] is, of course, [itex](1/4)(2\pi)= \pi/2[/itex].
 
Halls:
That should be:
[tex]\frac{1}{4}(1-2\cos(2x)+\frac{1}{2}(1+\cos(4x)))[/tex]
yielding 3/8 to integrate, agreeing with the teacher's answer.
 
Maybe your teacher is using the complex exponential version of trig functions...

[tex]\sin^4 t = \left(\frac{e^{it}-e^{-it}}{2i}\right)^4[/tex]

and Pascal's triangle is of obvious help in expanding the numerator of the power.
 
The correct relation is fairly easy to gain by repeated use of partial integration:

1. Let [tex]I_{n}=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sin^{n}tdt=-\cos(t)\sin^{n-1}t\mid_{t=0}^{t=2\pi}+\int_{0}^{2\pi}(n-1)\cos^{2}t\sin^{n-2}t=(n-1)\int_{0}^{2\pi}(\sin^{n-2}t-\sin^{n}t)dt=(n-1)I_{n-2}-(n-1)I_{n}[/tex]

2. Thus, we have gained the recurrence relation:
[tex]I_{n}=(n-1)I_{n-2}-(n-1)I_{n}\to{I}_{n}=\frac{n-1}{n}I_{n-2}, n\geq{2}[/tex]

(The case is identical if cosine constitutes our base, rather than sine, the exponent "n" remaining the same)
3. We note that [tex]I_{0}=2\pi, I_{1}=0[/tex]
Thus, we easily see that for "n" odd, the integral will be 0.
Henceforth, we assume even n=2p for natural number p.

4. We may write, for any particular "n", the value as a "sew-saw"-pattern starting with "n" as the value in the leftmost denominator:
[tex]I_{n}=(\frac{n-1}{n}*\frac{n-3}{n-2}*...*\frac{1}{2})*2\pi[/tex]

5. This can again be twiddled into an explicit form as follows:
With n=2p, the denominator [itex]n*(n-2)*(n-4)...2=2^{p}(p!)[/itex], where p! is the factorial of p.
Multiplying both the numerator and denominator with this expression yields:
[tex]I_{n}=\frac{n!}{2^{n}(p!)^{2}}*2\pi=\pi*2^{1-n}*\frac{n!}{(n-p)!p!}=\pi*2^{1-n}*\binom{n}{p}[/tex]

The binomial coefficients are closely related to..Pascal's triangle. :smile:
 
Last edited:
g_edgar said:
Maybe your teacher is using the complex exponential version of trig functions...
[tex]\sin^4 t = \left(\frac{e^{it}-e^{-it}}{2i}\right)^4[/tex]
and Pascal's triangle is of obvious help in expanding the numerator of the power.

That looks like a good idea.

I'd prefer a slight improvement
[tex]\sin^4 t = \Im\left(e^{it}\left(\frac{e^{it}-e^{-it}}{2i}\right)^3\right)[/tex]
Then it's easier to convert back to tri-functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K