Linking gradient of IV graph and resistance

  • #1
MBBphys
Gold Member
55
0

Homework Statement


If I have a current-voltage (y-x) graph for a resistor, I could argue that the reciprocal of the gradient at a point is equal to the resistance of that resistor at that pd across it.

However, on a markscheme for an AS level physics paper, they penalised linking gradient to resistance in any way whatsoever. Why is that?

Thanks in advance for any help!

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
35,550
6,440

Homework Statement


If I have a current-voltage (y-x) graph for a resistor, I could argue that the reciprocal of the gradient at a point is equal to the resistance of that resistor at that pd across it.

However, on a markscheme for an AS level physics paper, they penalised linking gradient to resistance in any way whatsoever. Why is that?

Thanks in advance for any help!

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
It might help to quote the whole question verbatim. E.g. is it possible there is inductance involved here?
 
  • #5
MBBphys
Gold Member
55
0
And the markscheme's attached as well if you wish to see
The actual section of the markscheme, with the comment about not accepting link between gradient and resistance highlighted. Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • #6
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
35,550
6,440
I believe the author of the mark scheme stuffed up in at least two ways.
In the "do not allow" there is a crucial word missing. It should say "do not allow either of the first two marking points if no reference made linking gradient and R value". The point is that the two options being allowed as variants to the preferred answer are incomplete unless you mention the gradient as the way to determine R.
This is also a blunder: "qualification: I increases faster than V"
Since I and V are dimensionally different, it does not mean anything to say that one increases faster than the other. It should say "the rate of increase of I with respect to V increases".
 

Related Threads on Linking gradient of IV graph and resistance

  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
19K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
794
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
855
Top