Linking gradient of IV graph and resistance

  • #1
MBBphys
Gold Member
55
0

Homework Statement


If I have a current-voltage (y-x) graph for a resistor, I could argue that the reciprocal of the gradient at a point is equal to the resistance of that resistor at that pd across it.

However, on a markscheme for an AS level physics paper, they penalised linking gradient to resistance in any way whatsoever. Why is that?

Thanks in advance for any help!

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
38,019
7,714

Homework Statement


If I have a current-voltage (y-x) graph for a resistor, I could argue that the reciprocal of the gradient at a point is equal to the resistance of that resistor at that pd across it.

However, on a markscheme for an AS level physics paper, they penalised linking gradient to resistance in any way whatsoever. Why is that?

Thanks in advance for any help!

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
It might help to quote the whole question verbatim. E.g. is it possible there is inductance involved here?
 
  • #3
MBBphys
Gold Member
55
0
It might help to quote the whole question verbatim. E.g. is it possible there is inductance involved here?
It's question 1 part c) of the document attached; thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 175458-question-paper-unit-g482-01-electrons-waves-and-photons.pdf
    215.4 KB · Views: 200
  • #4
MBBphys
Gold Member
55
0
It's question 1 part c) of the document attached; thanks!
And the markscheme's attached as well if you wish to see
 

Attachments

  • 176278-mark-scheme-unit-g482-electrons-waves-and-photons-june.pdf
    166 KB · Views: 217
  • #5
MBBphys
Gold Member
55
0
And the markscheme's attached as well if you wish to see
The actual section of the markscheme, with the comment about not accepting link between gradient and resistance highlighted. Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    60.4 KB · Views: 509
  • #6
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
38,019
7,714
I believe the author of the mark scheme stuffed up in at least two ways.
In the "do not allow" there is a crucial word missing. It should say "do not allow either of the first two marking points if no reference made linking gradient and R value". The point is that the two options being allowed as variants to the preferred answer are incomplete unless you mention the gradient as the way to determine R.
This is also a blunder: "qualification: I increases faster than V"
Since I and V are dimensionally different, it does not mean anything to say that one increases faster than the other. It should say "the rate of increase of I with respect to V increases".
 

Related Threads on Linking gradient of IV graph and resistance

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
C
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
74K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
23K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
818
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Top