Links Between Electromagnetic, Electro Static and Gravitational Fields?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationships and similarities between gravitational fields, electromagnetic fields, and electrostatic fields. Participants examine theoretical frameworks, mathematical analogies, and implications of these fields in various contexts, including general relativity and the behavior of light in gravitational fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that gravitational and electrostatic fields obey similar mathematical equations, specifically Poisson's equation, suggesting potential similarities in their properties.
  • Others argue that while there are mathematical similarities, the electromagnetic field is governed by different equations that do not apply to gravity, particularly when considering time dependence.
  • A participant points out that gravitational fields exhibit constraints similar to magnetic fields, prompting further inquiry into their relationship.
  • Visual evidence is presented, showing similarities between magnetic and electric fields, with claims that similar force fields apply to gravitational interactions between masses.
  • One participant suggests that while analogies can be drawn between different fields, studying general relativity may challenge the initial assumptions about these similarities.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of black holes and questions the behavior of light in a gravitational field, proposing that light might gain speed as it travels through curved spacetime.
  • Another participant counters this by stating that relativity prohibits changes to the speed of light, explaining that energy and frequency of light change in a gravitational field, leading to gravitational redshift.
  • One participant speculates about altering the principles of relativity to allow changes to the speed of light, raising questions about the implications of such a change.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the relationships between the fields. While some acknowledge mathematical similarities, others emphasize the distinct nature of electromagnetic and gravitational fields, leading to unresolved questions and competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various theoretical frameworks, including general relativity, without reaching consensus on the implications of their discussions. The conversation includes speculative ideas that remain unproven and dependent on interpretations of established theories.

WARLORDTF
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
When Studying the properties of matter, I came across the properties of Gravity, electromagnetism and electro static fields I'm Wondering:

As Gravity and Magnetic Fields a alike and some formulas for finding out the gravity are the same could the three have the same properties. (I have not metioned much of electro static forces as I am not fully knowledgeable in that area of science).

Please can someone clear up this matter
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first glance you're right because, classically, the Gravitational Field obeys the same Poisson's equation as Electrostatic Field do, namely
[tex]\nabla^2 \phi = - c \rho[/tex]
with [tex]\phi[/tex] electrostatic or gravitational potential and [tex]\rho[/tex] charge or mass density and c an appropriate constant.

But this view is quite naive...because we know since Maxwell that there exist a unique entity called Electromagnetic Field which is governed by 4 equation which have nothing in common with gravity, once you plug in the time dependence. Remember also that the electromagnetic field you measure depends on your state of motion, this is hardly wrong for gravity!

Hope being helpfull...

Ciao!
 
Yet If The Gravitational field is recorded it shows similar constraints as a magnetic field...
Does It Not?
 
Photos showing similarity between magnetic field (left) & electric field (right), indicating they obey the same rules. Same force fields apply to gravitational fields between 2 masses.
Please View The Two Picture attatchments.
 

Attachments

  • epoles.jpg
    epoles.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 430
  • magpoles.gif
    magpoles.gif
    71.4 KB · Views: 527
Yes, it's true. But I think that a quite remarkable feature of physics is that you can apply a common mathematical structure (such as the "technology" of field line you quoted) to the most different topic or physical situation. From this point of view the fact that the field line of a system with two masses or that of a magnet or that of a couple of charges are similar is nothing more than an accident...

If your idea is to find analogies between the gravitational field and electromagnetic field I think that you're going to change your mind when you will study General Relativity because that is the correct (unless until now...) framework to deal with gravitation.

Ciao!
 
Diverting from my initial question, We both know black holes have gravity-
but isn't the gravity another method of a curve in the space-time continuum. Therefore, because we know that a black holes gravity pulls everything - even light wouldn't the light (according to Planck's formula) be gaining speed as it travels?
If this is true (however unprovable it may seem) wouldn't the light travel into it's own past light cone. (If you believe that if you travel quicker than light you shall go back in time).
 
Unfortunately the relativity forbids the speed of light to be changed...what happens is that the energy of the photon falling in a gravitational field grows up, so does his frequency ( E = h f ) and what you observe is a sort of gravitational red shift...experimentally observed! So the theory accounts for the fact that the light change its motion, but not its speed.
A thing that always amaze me is the opposite of this...I mean...if matter/energy can, actually do, curve the spacetime it would be in principle possible to create a wave packet of light so energetic to be able to modify the gravitational fields of the solar system for instance and in some figurative sense you can "stop the moon by turning the light on"!
 
what about if the relativity was changed so light is the operandum. therefore being able to change the C Value.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K