I Liouville operator time dependency

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter SchroedingersLion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user seeking help with basic concepts in classical mechanics for a computational physics lecture, specifically regarding the Liouville operator and its time dependency. The user initially struggles to present equations clearly, opting to include a picture instead. Other participants suggest using LaTeX for better formula representation in future posts. The user acknowledges the advice and expresses intent to improve their submissions. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of clear communication in technical discussions.
SchroedingersLion
Messages
211
Reaction score
56
Hi guys,

I have a two questions concerning basics of classical mechanics.
It is to my current computational physics lecture. As I don't know how to write formulas here, I had to include the equations and the situation as a picture.

mprender.png


I would appreciate the answers.

Regards

edit: quality sucks a little bit, sorry about that ~~
 

Attachments

  • mprender.png
    mprender.png
    24.4 KB · Views: 739
Physics news on Phys.org
SchroedingersLion said:
Hi guys,

I have a two questions concerning basics of classical mechanics.
It is to my current computational physics lecture. As I don't know how to write formulas here, I had to include the equations and the situation as a picture.

View attachment 225041

I would appreciate the answers.

Regards

edit: quality sucks a little bit, sorry about that ~~
You can use LaTeX to write formulas.
 
  • Like
Likes SchroedingersLion
tnich said:
You can use LaTeX to write formulas.
Thanks for the hint. I will use Latex next time.
 
*push*

=(
 

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Help with the Proof of an Operator Identity
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Time dependence of operators in the Schrödinger picture
Replies
5
Views
2K
B A stupidly basic question about expectation value
Replies
8
Views
1K
I How to add time variation to a Schrodinger operator?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Curl operator for time-varying vector
Replies
1
Views
2K
DMD is better without Ergodic Theory and Koopman Operators
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Velocity operator, its expression and eigenvalues
Replies
27
Views
3K
I Understanding Ultrasound Attenuation and Reflection in Aluminum Sheets
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Interpreting Unitary Time Evolution
Replies
10
Views
1K
I Dot product of two vector operators in unusual coordinates
Replies
14
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top