List compounds in order of increasing melting point

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ordering of compounds based on their melting points, specifically focusing on the influence of ionic charge, atomic radius, and lattice energy. Participants explore periodic trends, bonding types, and the implications of these factors on melting points, with a mix of theoretical reasoning and practical examples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the further an element is from chlorine on the periodic table, the more ionic the compound is, which they believe correlates with a higher melting point.
  • Another participant questions the charges on the cations and how they relate to the melting points.
  • A participant argues that a higher charge on the cation (Al +3 vs. Mg +2 vs. Na +1) implies a higher melting point due to increased ionic character.
  • Discussion includes the effect of increasing nuclear charge on atomic radius and how this affects the radius of cations as ionic charge increases.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between lattice energy and melting point, suggesting that higher lattice energy correlates with higher melting points.
  • One participant mentions the need for further reading on lattice energy to clarify their understanding.
  • Another participant provides specific melting point values for AlCl3, MgCl2, and NaCl, noting the conditions under which these values apply.
  • There is a mention of the covalent nature of some ionic compounds, particularly AlCl3, which complicates the expected trends based on periodicity.
  • Participants express confusion regarding the correct ordering of melting points based on the discussion of periodic trends and bonding types.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct ordering of the compounds by melting point, as there are competing views regarding the influence of ionic charge, covalent character, and lattice energy. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about bonding types and the simplifications made in the context of periodic trends. The influence of covalent character and the specific conditions affecting melting points are also noted but not fully resolved.

toothpaste666
Messages
517
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


chemproblem.png

The Attempt at a Solution


My answer was C but the correct answer is A. My reasoning is that they are all bonded to chlorine, so the further away the element is from chlorine on the periodic table, the more ionic the compound is and the higher the melting point is. The correct answer was the opposite ordering of the answer i picked and i can't figure out why
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, nothing like the trends of the periodic table --- what can you tell me about the charges on the cations?
 
Al is +3 Mg is +2 and Na is +1, so since the cation of Al has a higher charge, it is more ionic and therefore has the highest melting point?
 
Let's not get too far ahead --- you are on the right track, but let's take things a step at a time. All these are in the same row/period of the table, and what effect does increasing nuclear charge have on atomic radius as you move across the table? Step 2, what effect on radius of cations as ionic charge increases? Three, what effect of that change in radius on lattice energy? Four, what effect of lattice energy on melting point?
 
increasing nuclear charge reduces the atomic radius. as for the effect of cations , the more positive the charge the smaller the radius. As for the lattice energy I am not sure if it is the same as ionization energy, but i know ionization energy is higher if the radius is smaller. is this right so far?
 
You are cooking.
 
so if this is right then i would say that the higher the ionization energy the higher the melting point. if it takes more energy to break the compound apart it makes sense that it would break apart at a higher temperature right?
 
"Lattice energy." The more highly charged the cation, the larger the energy released by anions falling into its electric field, and that is the energy that must be overcome to melt the compound.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: toothpaste666
I see. Time to do some more reading on lattice energy. thank you!
 
  • #10
Time to stick to facts ;) According to wikipedia:

AlCl3 192.4°C
MgCl2 714°C
NaCl 801°C
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #11
Borek said:
Time to stick to facts ;)

Another beautiful periodic trend ruined by ugly facts --- not only 192.4 C, but at 2.5 atm. AgCl melted on an anodized Al surface (Al2O3) on a hotplate, under a hood, yields AgO + AlCl3, the AgO decomposes to form a nice silver film bonded to metallic Al, the chloride having sublimed, and you're all set to attach thermocouples, other electrical leads, to insulated (heavily anodized) Al heat sinks, or other Al parts. Been doing that for years, and couldn't remember it in this context? Gotta stop taking it for granted that teaching exercises and answer keys are prepared or proof-read.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: toothpaste666 and Borek
  • #12
Wait now i am confused lol
 
  • #13
Was the question at the end of a discussion of periodic trends? Asking you, "If this, then what would you expect the order to be?" I walked right into that trap as Borek has pointed out --- didn't even bother to think about what's in the handbooks.
 
  • #14
TBH I was ready to fell into that trap as well, I just remembered that AlCl3 is surprisingly covalent - so I decided to check what the real numbers are before commenting.

Toothpaste: chances are whoever asked the question and listed a "correct" answer did it without checking facts and following one the simplified models. As you see, that's often dangerous.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: toothpaste666
  • #15
yeah this was after learning about periodic trends as well as learning about different types of bonding. so according to periodic trends it would be A but really its C?
 
  • #16
You are catching on --- sorry I didn't catch it earlier. Other effects at work that don't really count as "periodic trends" include "covalent" nature of some ionic bonds, and ratios of ionic radii and how they pack into crystalline lattices. Highly charged ions, like Al3+, will distort the electron distribution around the chloride ions, leading to a molten state in which molecular species like AlCl3 and Al2Cl6 are dominant rather than ionic species like Na+ and Cl- for the other end of the T range. MgCl2 is going to be splitting the difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
23K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K