List of H20 breakdown substances

  • Thread starter jake jot
  • Start date
  • Tags
    List
In summary, when salt is added to water, the salt molecules break apart and are pulled apart by the water molecules. This is due to the attractions between the slightly electropositive sodium portion of salt and the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water, as well as the attractions between the slightly electronegative chlorine portion of salt and the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water. This tug-of-war between ionic bonds and covalent bonds results in the dissolution of salt in water. Other polar compounds can also react with water molecules in a similar manner. Some common polar compounds include alcohol, which is safe to touch, and all polar compounds are IR active. The cheapest IR spectrometer available for experimentation can be found
  • #1
jake jot
302
17
When salt is added to water, the water H20 molecule breaks apart. If you add apple juice to water, does it also happen? I'd like to see list of all substances that when added to water can break apart the H20 molecules and manner of breakup. Which of them is like salt added to water? Thank you.
molecules_ds.png
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
jake jot said:
When salt is added to water, the water H20 molecule breaks apart.

It doesn't. It can undergo some reactions in some cases for some salts, but in most cases these are the same reactions that occur in water even without any salt added, just the equilibrium is shifted.

I'd like to see list of all substances that when added to water can break apart the H20 molecules and manner of breakup.

It doesn't work this way. At best we can list some groups/classes of substances that can react with each other. Making a full list is impossible, as there is no such thing as a finite list of compounds.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint, BillTre and berkeman
  • #3
Borek said:
It doesn't. It can undergo some reactions in some cases for some salts, but in most cases these are the same reactions that occur in water even without any salt added, just the equilibrium is shifted.
It doesn't work this way. At best we can list some groups/classes of substances that can react with each other. Making a full list is impossible, as there is no such thing as a finite list of compounds.

Ok, let's not list billions or infinite number of compounds but just a dozen or so. What other substances are polar and can react with water molecules like the following descriptions?

"When table salt is placed in water, the slightly electropositive sodium portion is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water molecules. At the same time, the slightly electronegative chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water.
In neither case is a true bond created, but the attractions set up a "tug-of-war" in which the ionic bonds of NaCl and the covalent bonds of H2O are both strained."

What other substances are polar like salt?
 
  • #4
jake jot said:
Ok, let's not list billions or infinite number of compounds but just a dozen or so. What other substances are polar and can react with water molecules like the following descriptions?

"When table salt is placed in water, the slightly electropositive sodium portion is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water molecules. At the same time, the slightly electronegative chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water.
In neither case is a true bond created, but the attractions set up a "tug-of-war" in which the ionic bonds of NaCl and the covalent bonds of H2O are both strained."

What other substances are polar like salt?
Any polar compounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_polarity
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint and BillTre
  • #5
jake jot said:
When salt is added to water, the water H20 molecule breaks apart.
No, it's the salt molecules that break apart, not the water molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint, Klystron, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #6
HAYAO said:

Ok. read them.

In the house, what are the common compounds that are polar besides water/salt and alcohol? Something safe to touch, as I want to put polar molecules in my fingers and explore them.

I also read all polar compounds are IR active. And IR spectrometer are cheap. What is the cheapest one out there that you can buy and experiment?
 
  • #7
jake jot said:
Ok, let's not list billions or infinite number of compounds but just a dozen or so. What other substances are polar and can react with water molecules like the following descriptions?

"When table salt is placed in water, the slightly electropositive sodium portion is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water molecules. At the same time, the slightly electronegative chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water.
In neither case is a true bond created, but the attractions set up a "tug-of-war" in which the ionic bonds of NaCl and the covalent bonds of H2O are both strained."

What other substances are polar like salt?
That description appears to be quoted from https://sciencing.com/happens-salt-added-water-5208174.html,
which says what you quoted:
When table salt is placed in water, the slightly electropositive sodium portion is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water molecules. At the same time, the slightly electronegative chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water.

In neither case is a true bond created, but the attractions set up a "tug-of-war" in which the ionic bonds of NaCl and the covalent bonds of H2O are both strained.
but also immediately following that says:
The stronger covalent bonds of water (which is also held together generally by hydrogen bonds between water molecules) win out, and NaCl is pulled apart, with the Na+ and Cl_ ions setting loosely in place between the intact H2O molecules. NaCl is then dissolved.

That source cites this one as a reference ##-## https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/water-molecules-and-their-interaction-salt-molecules:
Water molecules and their interaction with salt molecules
1605678805243.png
This diagram shows the positive and negative parts of a water molecule. It also depicts how a charge, such as on an ion (Na or Cl, for example) can interact with a water molecule.​
At the molecular level, salt dissolves in water due to electrical charges and due to the fact that both water and salt compounds are polar, with positive and negative charges on opposite sides in the molecule. The bonds in salt compounds are called ionic because they both have an electrical charge—the chloride ion is negatively charged and the sodium ion is positively charged. Likewise, a water molecule is ionic in nature, but the bond is called covalent, with two hydrogen atoms both situating themselves with their positive charge on one side of the oxygen atom, which has a negative charge. When salt is mixed with water, the salt dissolves because the covalent bonds of water are stronger than the ionic bonds in the salt molecules.​
The positively-charged side of the water molecules are attracted to the negatively-charged chloride ions and the negatively-charged side of the water molecules are attracted to the positively-charged sodium ions. Essentially, a tug-of-war ensues with the water molecules winning the match. Water molecules pull the sodium and chloride ions apart, breaking the ionic bond that held them together. After the salt compounds are pulled apart, the sodium and chloride atoms are surrounded by water molecules, as this diagram shows. Once this happens, the salt is dissolved, resulting in a homogeneous solution.​
Although both sources say that it is the sodium and chloride ions, and not the components of the water molecule, that are pulled apart (which is something that @russ_watters succinctly pointed out), there is an important difference in the description of the ionic interactions ##-## repeating from the sciencing.com source:
When table salt is placed in water, the slightly electropositive sodium portion is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water molecules. At the same time, the slightly electronegative chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water.
The second sentence is incorrect (due to a probably-inadvertent repetition of "electronegative oxygen portion" from the preceding sentence) ##-## it would not have been incorrect to say that the negatively charged chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the positively charged hydrogen portions of the water molecule, which is probably what the writer intended.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and jake jot
  • #8
sysprog said:
That description appears to be quoted from https://sciencing.com/happens-salt-added-water-5208174.html,
which says what you quoted:

but also immediately following that says:That source cites this one as a reference ##-## https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/water-molecules-and-their-interaction-salt-molecules:
Water molecules and their interaction with salt molecules
This diagram shows the positive and negative parts of a water molecule. It also depicts how a charge, such as on an ion (Na or Cl, for example) can interact with a water molecule.​
At the molecular level, salt dissolves in water due to electrical charges and due to the fact that both water and salt compounds are polar, with positive and negative charges on opposite sides in the molecule. The bonds in salt compounds are called ionic because they both have an electrical charge—the chloride ion is negatively charged and the sodium ion is positively charged. Likewise, a water molecule is ionic in nature, but the bond is called covalent, with two hydrogen atoms both situating themselves with their positive charge on one side of the oxygen atom, which has a negative charge. When salt is mixed with water, the salt dissolves because the covalent bonds of water are stronger than the ionic bonds in the salt molecules.​
The positively-charged side of the water molecules are attracted to the negatively-charged chloride ions and the negatively-charged side of the water molecules are attracted to the positively-charged sodium ions. Essentially, a tug-of-war ensues with the water molecules winning the match. Water molecules pull the sodium and chloride ions apart, breaking the ionic bond that held them together. After the salt compounds are pulled apart, the sodium and chloride atoms are surrounded by water molecules, as this diagram shows. Once this happens, the salt is dissolved, resulting in a homogeneous solution.​
Although both sources say that it is the sodium and chloride ions, and not the components of the water molecule, that are pulled apart (which is something that @russ_watters succinctly pointed out), there is an important difference in the description of the ionic interactions ##-## repeating from the sciencing.com source:
The second sentence is incorrect (due to a probably-inadvertent repetition of "electronegative oxygen portion" from the preceding sentence) ##-## it would not have been incorrect to say that the negatively charged chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the positively charged hydrogen portions of the water molecule, which is probably what the writer intended.

Thanks for the enlightening explanations.

What common household substances can act like water and salt in the polar aspect?
 
  • #9
jake jot said:
Thanks for the enlightening explanations.

What common household substances can act like water and salt in the polar aspect?
This list of polar-molecule substances (I underlined the ones that may be considered to be 'common household substances') is from https://sciencenotes.org/polar-and-nonpolar-molecules/:
  • Water – H2O
  • Ammonia – NH3
  • Sulfur dioxide – SO2
  • Hydrogen sulfide – H2S
  • Carbon monoxide – CO
  • Ozone – O3
  • Hydrofluoric acid
  • Ethanol – C2H6O (and other alcohols with an OH at one end)
  • Sucrose – C12H22O11 (and other sugars with OH groups)
 
  • Like
Likes jake jot
  • #10
sysprog said:
That description appears to be quoted from https://sciencing.com/happens-salt-added-water-5208174.html,
which says what you quoted:

but also immediately following that says:That source cites this one as a reference ##-## https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/water-molecules-and-their-interaction-salt-molecules:
Water molecules and their interaction with salt molecules
This diagram shows the positive and negative parts of a water molecule. It also depicts how a charge, such as on an ion (Na or Cl, for example) can interact with a water molecule.​
At the molecular level, salt dissolves in water due to electrical charges and due to the fact that both water and salt compounds are polar, with positive and negative charges on opposite sides in the molecule. The bonds in salt compounds are called ionic because they both have an electrical charge—the chloride ion is negatively charged and the sodium ion is positively charged. Likewise, a water molecule is ionic in nature, but the bond is called covalent, with two hydrogen atoms both situating themselves with their positive charge on one side of the oxygen atom, which has a negative charge. When salt is mixed with water, the salt dissolves because the covalent bonds of water are stronger than the ionic bonds in the salt molecules.​
The positively-charged side of the water molecules are attracted to the negatively-charged chloride ions and the negatively-charged side of the water molecules are attracted to the positively-charged sodium ions. Essentially, a tug-of-war ensues with the water molecules winning the match. Water molecules pull the sodium and chloride ions apart, breaking the ionic bond that held them together. After the salt compounds are pulled apart, the sodium and chloride atoms are surrounded by water molecules, as this diagram shows. Once this happens, the salt is dissolved, resulting in a homogeneous solution.​
Although both sources say that it is the sodium and chloride ions, and not the components of the water molecule, that are pulled apart (which is something that @russ_watters succinctly pointed out), there is an important difference in the description of the ionic interactions ##-## repeating from the sciencing.com source:
The second sentence is incorrect (due to a probably-inadvertent repetition of "electronegative oxygen portion" from the preceding sentence) ##-## it would not have been incorrect to say that the negatively charged chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the positively charged hydrogen portions of the water molecule, which is probably what the writer intended.

How do you interpret it in terms of quantum chemistry? What is the quantum chemistry or wave function of pure water? And what happens to the wave function when salt is added? What text strings to look for in the references, and do you have any?
 
  • #11
jake jot said:
How do you interpret it in terms of quantum chemistry? What is the quantum chemistry or wave function of pure water? And what happens to the wave function when salt is added? What text strings to look for in the references, and do you have any?
I think that the applicability of quantum theory to ordinary chemical reactions is something to be aware of the existence of, but that for most practical purposes in the study of basic chemistry it can be safely disregarded.

I think that it should be examined in depth only after one has acquired a competent understanding of chemical interactions at a basic classical level, e.g. learning and working with and understanding oxidation and reduction, acids, bases, and salts, why carbon has the most reactions of any element, why flourine is the most reactive, why helium is chemically inert, etc., understanding Bohr and Mendeleev before digging into L. Pauling, etc..

Also, importantly, understanding quantum theory requires understanding of very advanced mathematics, while for the most part, at the undergraduate level, study of chemistry requires mathematiccs at about the level described in this booklet: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Docume...on-Internships/Maths-for-Chemists-Booklet.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dale, symbolipoint, Klystron and 2 others
  • #14
What is your expectation from this chemistry set?

I saw there were two reviews and one said their 6 yr old daughter enjoyed the experiments.

If your expectation is to learn chemistry at the high school or college level, I think you will be sadly disappointed. However, for some light self learning it may be good.

A lot of chemistry involves measurement and calculation of moles, molarity, molality, solutions, balancing equations ... I don't think this set will even approach those things.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint and sysprog
  • #15
jake jot said:
... IR spectrometer are cheap. What is the cheapest one out there that you can buy and experiment?
Do you not know how to use Google?
 
  • #16
phinds said:
Do you not know how to use Google?

Tried that. The articles were complex. So I was thinking those who have actually acquired one and tried it. Polar compound means the electrons can move like antenna so they absorb and emit IR. This is profound thing.

Also PF is a self contained team of multidisciplinary experts who can handle LHC or even build nukes or create new physics theories that work. If we were to colonize other planets. The PF team can recreate all parts of science, and hence Earth "designated survivor". Therefore asking personal tips of cheap IR spectrometers are justified. But then I think most have access to expensive ones only. I just want to try IR spectrometers on polar compound and see if they are very dense compared to nonpolar (which doesn't have IR) but then IR also work far from thermal equilibrium? I guess it is the IR frequencies?
 
  • Haha
Likes jedishrfu
  • #17
jake jot said:
Tried that. The articles were complex. So I was thinking those who have actually acquired one and tried it. Polar compound means the electrons can move like antenna so they absorb and emit IR. This is profound thing.

Also PF is a self contained team of multidisciplinary experts who can handle LHC or even build nukes or create new physics theories that work. If we were to colonize other planets. The PF team can recreate all parts of science, and hence Earth "designated survivor". Therefore asking personal tips of cheap IR spectrometers are justified. But then I think most have access to expensive ones only. I just want to try IR spectrometers on polar compound and see if they are very dense compared to nonpolar (which doesn't have IR) but then IR also work far from thermal equilibrium? I guess it is the IR frequencies?
There is a lot that is wrong in there. You should really pick up a chemistry textbook or dig into Openstax as @jedishrfu suggested.

All molecules absorb and emit IR radiation, whether polar or not. It is related to the vibration of molecules, i.e., the relative motion of the nuclei with respect to one another.

The only IR spectrometer I know of are laboratory equipment, and I don't think that you would be able to use one (or even prepare samples to be studied) without some guidance.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint and jedishrfu
  • #18
DrClaude said:
There is a lot that is wrong in there. You should really pick up a chemistry textbook or dig into Openstax as @jedishrfu suggested.

All molecules absorb and emit IR radiation, whether polar or not. It is related to the vibration of molecules, i.e., the relative motion of the nuclei with respect to one another.
Not quite all. A molecule needs transition dipole moment around a bond, any bond.
Diatomic molecules with same atoms both side of bond cannot absorb or emit IR. Such as N2, O2 or I2.
Diatomic molecules with two different atoms can have quite small dipole moment, but the dipole moment would have to be exactly zero to prevent IR. CO has only a small dipole moment, but does absorb IR.
Now, many molecules have several slightly polar bonds whose dipole moments cancel out by symmetry. In CO2, the two C-O bonds are opposite in direction so dipole moments cancel and carbon dioxide is not polar. But the IR absorptions do not cancel, which is why CO2 is a greenhouse gas. In CH4, C-H bonds have little polarity - carbon and hydrogen are close but not exactly equal in electronegativity - and the 4 dipole moments cancel out anyway. But the IR do not cancel, and weak as the polarity is, it is enough to make methane a greenhouse gas.
To put alkane polarity into contect, while ethane also has no dipole moment due to symmetry, propane does not have such symmetry. Two hydrogens are on one side of central carbon, two methyl groups on the opposite side. Resulting in a nonzero dipole moment... of about 0,1 D. Compare dimethyl ether with the same bent geometry but two O-C bonds... dipole moment 1,3 D.

Oh, and NO, not all polar molecules are electrolytes. Dimethyl ether, acetone... fairly polar but not enough for electrolytic dissociation.
 
  • Like
Likes chemisttree
  • #19
jedishrfu #14 is an excellent response.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and sysprog
  • #20
I wrote an 'erratum' email to the writer of the sciencing.com article (omitting salutations in the quote):
Your article at https://sciencing.com/happens-salt-added-water-5208174.html article, contains the following:
When table salt is placed in water, the slightly electropositive sodium portion is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water molecules. At the same time, the slightly electronegative chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the slightly electronegative oxygen portion of water.
The second sentence is incorrect (due to a probably-inadvertent
repetition of "electronegative oxygen portion" from the preceding sentence) − it would not have been incorrect to say that the negatively charged chlorine portion of NaCl is attracted to the positively charged hydrogen portions of the water molecule, which is presumably what you intended.
He soon responded (again omitting salutations):
Hey, thanks for picking this up. You're correct in identifying the process that led to the mistake, but a mistake it is, and I will notify the people with access to the site to make the change. Unfortunately, Leaf Media discontinued its Sciencing arm in April, so it may be a while...
. . . just like a science guy to want to correct his mistake . . .
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Dale
  • #21
snorkack said:
Not quite all. A molecule needs transition dipole moment around a bond, any bond.
Diatomic molecules with same atoms both side of bond cannot absorb or emit IR. Such as N2, O2 or I2.
Diatomic molecules with two different atoms can have quite small dipole moment, but the dipole moment would have to be exactly zero to prevent IR. CO has only a small dipole moment, but does absorb IR.
Yes, homonuclear diatomic molecules are an exception, but I didn't want do get into those weeds.

By the way, what is important is not the dipole moment, but the variation of the dipole moment as the molecule vibrates.
 
  • #22
I think the simple rule is simply. IR spectroscopy spectrum (low infrared) come from interaction within a single molecule. While thermal IR (mid to far infrared) comes from interaction *between* molecules. Right? So in the case of thermal, all molecules produce IR unless at vacuum.

ir raman.jpg
 
  • #23
jake jot said:
I think the simple rule is simply. IR spectroscopy spectrum (low infrared) come from interaction within a single molecule. While thermal IR (mid to far infrared) comes from interaction *between* molecules. Right?
No.

jake jot said:
So in the case of thermal, all molecules produce IR unless at vacuum.
Do you mean "absolute zero" instead of "vacuum"?

jake jot said:
This is related to my reply to @snorkack. The normal modes of CO2 that are active in the infrared are the asymmetric stretch and the bending modes, which change the dipole moment of the molecule (in this case, induce a dipole since CO2 is globally non-polar), while the symmetric stretch is not active in the infrared (dipole stays unchanged, = 0) and is only observable in Raman spectroscopy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #24
DrClaude said:
No.Do you mean "absolute zero" instead of "vacuum"?This is related to my reply to @snorkack. The normal modes of CO2 that are active in the infrared are the asymmetric stretch and the bending modes, which change the dipole moment of the molecule (in this case, induce a dipole since CO2 is globally non-polar), while the symmetric stretch is not active in the infrared (dipole stays unchanged, = 0) and is only observable in Raman spectroscopy.

Where do the images from thermal imagers come from? Is it not from the vibrations of the molecules (in between the molecules) as bulk? And not from those IR active modes?
 
  • #25
jake jot said:
Where do the images from thermal imagers come from? Is it not from the vibrations of the molecules (in between the molecules) as bulk? And not from those IR active modes?
If you are looking at solid objects, then of course the IR radiation comes from bulk modes. Gases will emit thermal radiation only in narrow bands, while bulk matter will have a much broader spectrum. This only reflects the fact that bulk matter has many, tightly-packed vibrational modes, while in the gas phase vibrational modes are discrete. But the phenomenon is the same.
 
  • #26
van der Waals bonds are weak - and therefore should vibrate only in far IR. If they have transition moment. Note that if they don´ t because of symmetry, bulk matter will still have multiphonon modes where the interaction of several phonons breaks symmetry - whether the symmetric bond is a van der Waals or a covalent one.
 
  • #27
Guys, for home substances, what is the range of near IR or visible frequencies that is absorbance active? I am deciding what range of wavelength of the IR spectrometer to get (a one time purchase that lasts a lifetime, unlike a smartphone that you can change every year).

This is for Near Infrared Range.

ModelsNumber of ElementsSpectrometer Range (nm)Grating(g/mm)Range (nm)Dispersion (nm/pixel)Estimated Resolving Resolution
DWARF-Star-NIR512900-1700250800nm1.5623.1nm
DWARF-Star-NIRb512900-1600300650nm1.2692.5nm
DWARF-Star-NIR25121250-1575600325nm0.6341.3nm
DWARF-Star-NIR2b5121150-1475600325nm0.6341.3nm
DWARF-Star-NIR10241000-1700600700nm0.6831.4nm
DWARF-Star-NIR3-HR5121530-1605120070nm0.1950.4nm
DWARF-Star-NIR3-HR10241500-16401200140nm0.1950.4nm
RED-Wave-NIRX5121500-2200300700nm1.3672.8nm
RED-Wave-NIRX10241500-2200600700nm0.6831.4nm
RED-Wave-NIRX-SR512900-23003001400nm5.3<13nm
NIRX-SR1024900-23006001400nm2.7<7nm
Micro-NIR11750-2150NA400nm110nm

This is for visible and UV light spectrometer.I won't get UV because it's hazardous. I want to be more familiar with polar substances by studying their IR absorbance and spectrum properties. I couldn't find the answer at google what range is useful for home use.
 
  • #28
DrClaude said:
No.Do you mean "absolute zero" instead of "vacuum"?This is related to my reply to @snorkack. The normal modes of CO2 that are active in the infrared are the asymmetric stretch and the bending modes, which change the dipole moment of the molecule (in this case, induce a dipole since CO2 is globally non-polar), while the symmetric stretch is not active in the infrared (dipole stays unchanged, = 0) and is only observable in Raman spectroscopy.

Something I don't quite get even after googling. When molecules are asymmetric, the movement can cause dipole moments and infrared active, the explanation being it moves like antenna sending infrared photons. No problem about this.

But with regards to polarizability, which involves the formation of temporary dipoles due to momentary electron cloud distortions. How come polarizability is low in asymmetric molecules? Do they cancel? How? I heard about the rule of mutual exclusion. But I want visual explanation why polarizability is low in asymmetric molecules.

5_2_table.jpg
About number 6. So IR spectroscopy gives an indication of ionic character in the molecule. There is no exception to the rule where covalent character is indicated?
 
  • #29
jake jot said:
How come polarizability is low in asymmetric molecules?
Do you have a source for this?

jake jot said:
About number 6. So IR spectroscopy gives an indication of ionic character in the molecule. There is no exception to the rule where covalent character is indicated?
The point is that the dipole is an indication of an uneven distribution of electrons. Hence a less covalent bond.
 
  • #30
DrClaude said:
Do you have a source for this?

Here is the exact passage:

Chapter5.pdf (uc.edu) (page 2)

"The mobility of electrons in a bond is called the Polarizability of the bond, i.e. a measure of how easy it is to move electrons and polarize a bond. For bonds with a strong dipole moment (which are IR active) the mobility or polarizability is
usually low.".

Do you think it's low or cancelled? In the following explanation, it's sort of cancelled.

5: Raman Spectroscopy - Chemistry LibreTexts

"The asymmetric stretch of carbon dioxide is IR active because there is a change in the net molecular dipole (Figure 5.2). In the asymmetric stretch, one bond is stretched and is now more polarizable while the other bond is compressed and is less polarizable. The change in polarizability of the longer bond is exactly offset by the change in the shorter bond such that the overall polarizability of the molecule does not change. Therefore, the asymmetric stretch is not Raman active.

I want to understand how exactly "The change in polarizability of the longer bond is exactly offset by the change in the shorter bond such that the overall polarizability of the molecule does not change.". Does it mean polarizability is also present but in the case of asymmetric molecules, it's cancelled? How is it canceled when the each side have separate electron cloud? How does the electron cloud in each side interact so that they are cancelled, and hence not Raman active?

asym illus.JPG
 
  • #31
First, to be pedantic: "Sorta" is not a scientific concept. Second, you seem to be making a number of confusions (which are quite common with beginners): one, between a quantity (e.g. polarisability) and the change in that quantity. All bonds are polarisable to some extent; the point is that to be Raman active a vibration must result in a change of polarisability. It is this change, not polarisability itself, that is cancelled. Two, between molecules and bonds (or vibrational modes, which may involve more than one bond). A symmetrical molecule may have asymmetrical vibrations which have a change of dipole moment and are IR active (like the one illustrated).

A more precise answer to your question involves a more detailed consideration of symmetry, which I'm guessing you haven't studied yet. The polarisability has certain symmetry properties which mean that Raman scattering of a photon can induce a change in vibrational state only for modes of certain symmetry types. In particular, for a centrosymmetric molecule, only centrosymmetric modes can be Raman active.

A more qualitative argument may go like this: Bear in mind that the relative change in bond length during a vibration is much, much smaller than the above diagram suggests (for ease of illustration). We may reasonably consider that, for small changes in length, the change in polarisability with bond length will, to a first approximation, vary linearly with the deformation. If we write dP/dx as P', the change in polarisability in an asymmetric stretching mode like that shown, where one bond lengthens by dx and the other shortens by dx, will be P'dx - P'dx = 0. For a symmetric stretch, where both bonds lengthen, it will be P'dx + P'dx ≠ 0. (For the dipole moment, we must remember that the moments of the two bonds are pointing in opposite directions, so the change in dipole moment for the asymmetric stretch is μ'dx - (-μ')dx ≠ 0, while for the symmetric stretch it is μ'dx + (-μ')dx = 0, so the asymmetric stretch is IR active but the symmetric stretch is not.)
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and jake jot
  • #32
mjc123 said:
First, to be pedantic: "Sorta" is not a scientific concept. Second, you seem to be making a number of confusions (which are quite common with beginners): one, between a quantity (e.g. polarisability) and the change in that quantity. All bonds are polarisable to some extent; the point is that to be Raman active a vibration must result in a change of polarisability. It is this change, not polarisability itself, that is cancelled. Two, between molecules and bonds (or vibrational modes, which may involve more than one bond). A symmetrical molecule may have asymmetrical vibrations which have a change of dipole moment and are IR active (like the one illustrated).

A more precise answer to your question involves a more detailed consideration of symmetry, which I'm guessing you haven't studied yet. The polarisability has certain symmetry properties which mean that Raman scattering of a photon can induce a change in vibrational state only for modes of certain symmetry types. In particular, for a centrosymmetric molecule, only centrosymmetric modes can be Raman active.

A more qualitative argument may go like this: Bear in mind that the relative change in bond length during a vibration is much, much smaller than the above diagram suggests (for ease of illustration). We may reasonably consider that, for small changes in length, the change in polarisability with bond length will, to a first approximation, vary linearly with the deformation. If we write dP/dx as P', the change in polarisability in an asymmetric stretching mode like that shown, where one bond lengthens by dx and the other shortens by dx, will be P'dx - P'dx = 0. For a symmetric stretch, where both bonds lengthen, it will be P'dx + P'dx ≠ 0. (For the dipole moment, we must remember that the moments of the two bonds are pointing in opposite directions, so the change in dipole moment for the asymmetric stretch is μ'dx - (-μ')dx ≠ 0, while for the symmetric stretch it is μ'dx + (-μ')dx = 0, so the asymmetric stretch is IR active but the symmetric stretch is not.)

Thanks. Let's illustrate this.

strokes shift.jpg


We know that during the inelastic scattering process the molecules excite to higher vibrational energy levels and make transitions to the ground level by emitting photons with a frequency different from the incident photons.

What is faster, the transition from higher vibration energy level to ground level or the one asymmetric stretch from left to right?

If the asymmetric stretch is faster, then there is no time for inelastic scattering. But if inelastic scattering is faster, it should release the say strokes photon and this should get out of the molecules to reach the detectors. So how can this change of polarizability be canceled when the photons were already released? Unless the one instance of asymmetric stretch from say left to right is faster so no time for inelastic scattering to occur? (I know the stretching occurs many billions of time a second or so. I'm describing 1/1000000000000000 millisec or less.)
 
  • #33
jake jot said:
(I know the stretching occurs many billions of time a second or so. I'm describing 1/1000000000000000 millisec or less.)
I'm not here denying your main point, but that number of miiliseconds is a few orders of magnitude too small ##--## I counted 15 instances of the zero numeral in your fractional number of milliseconds ##-## a billionth is 0.000000001 ##-## your number is a quadrillionth ##-## that's a millionth of a billionth ##-## of a millisecond.
 
  • #34
sysprog said:
I'm not here denying your main point, but that number of miiliseconds is a few orders of magnitude too small ##--## I counted 15 instances of the zero numeral in your fractional number of milliseconds ##-## a billionth is 0.000000001 ##-## your number is a quadrillionth ##-## that's a millionth of a billionth ##-## of a millisecond.

I just typed 000 without counting them.. just to emphasize I knew the stretching didn't occur in seconds but in billions of billions of milliseconds. I don't know exactly how fast, so how fast does one stretching occurs compared to the transition from virtual energy state to ground state, any ideas?
 
  • #35
Your reference says "Raman scattering has a lifetime of 10-14 s", which is comparable to the period of molecular vibrations - e.g. the antisymmetric stretch of CO2 at 2350 cm-1 has a period of 1.4 x 10-14 s. But in any case I don't get your point. There is no change of polarisability during the vibration, so there can be no Raman transition. It is forbidden by symmetry.
 
<h2>1. What is the significance of the "List of H20 breakdown substances" in scientific research?</h2><p>The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is a comprehensive list of all the substances that can be produced when water (H2O) is broken down through various chemical reactions. This list is important in scientific research as it helps to understand the different components that make up water and how they can be manipulated or combined to produce other substances.</p><h2>2. How is the "List of H20 breakdown substances" useful in studying the properties of water?</h2><p>The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is useful in studying the properties of water because it provides a reference for the different substances that can be formed from water. By understanding these substances, scientists can gain insight into the chemical and physical properties of water and how they contribute to its unique characteristics.</p><h2>3. Can the "List of H20 breakdown substances" be used in practical applications?</h2><p>Yes, the "List of H20 breakdown substances" can be used in various practical applications such as water treatment, industrial processes, and even in medical treatments. By knowing the substances that can be produced from water, scientists can develop new technologies and processes to utilize these substances for various purposes.</p><h2>4. How is the "List of H20 breakdown substances" relevant to environmental studies?</h2><p>The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is relevant to environmental studies as it helps to understand the different substances that can be produced from water and their impact on the environment. For example, the breakdown of water can produce toxic substances that can harm ecosystems, and this list can aid in identifying and monitoring these substances.</p><h2>5. Is the "List of H20 breakdown substances" complete and accurate?</h2><p>The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is a constantly evolving list and may not be completely accurate or comprehensive. New research and discoveries may lead to the addition or removal of substances from the list. However, it is regularly updated and serves as a valuable reference for scientists in the field of water chemistry.</p>

1. What is the significance of the "List of H20 breakdown substances" in scientific research?

The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is a comprehensive list of all the substances that can be produced when water (H2O) is broken down through various chemical reactions. This list is important in scientific research as it helps to understand the different components that make up water and how they can be manipulated or combined to produce other substances.

2. How is the "List of H20 breakdown substances" useful in studying the properties of water?

The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is useful in studying the properties of water because it provides a reference for the different substances that can be formed from water. By understanding these substances, scientists can gain insight into the chemical and physical properties of water and how they contribute to its unique characteristics.

3. Can the "List of H20 breakdown substances" be used in practical applications?

Yes, the "List of H20 breakdown substances" can be used in various practical applications such as water treatment, industrial processes, and even in medical treatments. By knowing the substances that can be produced from water, scientists can develop new technologies and processes to utilize these substances for various purposes.

4. How is the "List of H20 breakdown substances" relevant to environmental studies?

The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is relevant to environmental studies as it helps to understand the different substances that can be produced from water and their impact on the environment. For example, the breakdown of water can produce toxic substances that can harm ecosystems, and this list can aid in identifying and monitoring these substances.

5. Is the "List of H20 breakdown substances" complete and accurate?

The "List of H20 breakdown substances" is a constantly evolving list and may not be completely accurate or comprehensive. New research and discoveries may lead to the addition or removal of substances from the list. However, it is regularly updated and serves as a valuable reference for scientists in the field of water chemistry.

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Chemistry
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Chemistry
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top