Locus of all points due to a charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter tempneff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Points
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a point charge located in free space and asks for the locus of points where the electric field's x-component equals a specified value. The context is within electrostatics, specifically focusing on electric fields and their components in three-dimensional space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss converting coordinates and the implications of using spherical versus Cartesian coordinates. There is uncertainty about how to express the electric field's x-component and the relationship between the full vector and its unit vector.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the equations involved and the need to express the locus in terms of x, y, and z. There is ongoing exploration of how to derive the necessary expressions and the implications of the missing numerical value in the electric field equation.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the missing numerical value for the electric field, which affects the clarity of the problem setup. Participants are also questioning the necessity of including all three spatial dimensions in the final expression for the locus.

tempneff
Messages
82
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A 100 nC point charge is located at A(-1, 1, 3) in free space. (a) Find the locus of all point P(x,y,z) at which E_x = \frac{V}{m}. Find y_1 if P(-2,y_1,3) lies on that locus.

Homework Equations


E=k\frac{q}{r^2}\vec{r}\hspace{10pt}E_X=E\cos\theta\hspace{10pt}\vec{R}=<(x_2-x_1),(y_2-y_1),(z_2-z_1)>\hspace{10pt}
Cartesian to Spherical: r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}\hspace{10pt}\theta = cos^{-1}\frac{z}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}} \hspace{10pt} \phi = \cot^{-1}\frac{x}{y}

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted the vector R to spherical coordinates because I figured that using the radius I could find the field where \theta and \phi = 0 then convert back to cartesian...It didn't work. I had a hint that I should use E=k\frac{q}{\vert{\vec{R}\vert^3}}\vec{R} but I don't quite understand why. I believe this is just multiplying by 1, but I thought that while k\frac{q}{r^2}\vec{r} already include the vector I could just plug in \vec{R} for unit vector \vec{r} then why would I have to divide by the magnitude again.

I am sure at this point that I am misunderstanding things so any clarification of these concepts it priceless. Thanks in advance for any tips.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tempneff said:
E_x = \frac{V}{m}.
There seems to be a number missing. How many Volts/metre?
I see no merit in switching to polar. Use ##E=k\frac{q}{r^2}\vec{r}##, replacing r with x, y, z. Given that you only want the x component, how will you replace ##\vec{r}##?
(In the equation you posted with R3, the R vector appears to be the full vector, not the unit vector. Hence the need to divide by the magnitude again.)
 
Right, that was supposed to be E_x=500\frac{V}{m}

I'm not sure how I can replace \vec{r} reflecting only the x direction. Also, if they are asking for a locus, do i have to come up with a item including x,y, and z rather than just x.
 
tempneff said:
I'm not sure how I can replace \vec{r} reflecting only the x direction.
The complete vector (##\vec R##?) is <x, y, z>. The unit vector is the same divided by its magnitude. So what is the x component of that?
Also, if they are asking for a locus, do i have to come up with a item including x,y, and z
An equation involving x, y and z, yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K