Logical equivalence of statements with truth tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter icantadd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the logical equivalence of two statements involving logical operators: (S ∧ T) ∧ ¬(S ∧ T) and (S ∨ T) ⇒ (S ∧ T). Participants are exploring the concept of logical equivalence and its implications through truth tables.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of logical equivalence and whether the outputs of the two predicates match across all inputs. Some mention working through truth tables and comparing results, while others express uncertainty about the implications of their findings.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of attempts to clarify the concept of logical equivalence and the results from truth tables. Some participants affirm the definition of logical equivalence, while others provide insights into the specific truth values of the statements involved. The discussion is ongoing, with different interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that (S ∧ T) ∧ ¬(S ∧ T) will always be false, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the relationship between the two statements. This raises questions about the assumptions made regarding the truth values of S and T.

icantadd
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(S \wedge T) \wedge \neg (S \wedge T)

(S \vee T) \Rightarrow (S \wedge T)


Are the two (predicates?) logically equivalent?

Homework Equations



Not sure, but I believe that logical equivalence means that two predicates give the same output on the same input.

The Attempt at a Solution



Worked truth tables. The end result of both where statement T is t t f f and statement S is t f t f, in both cases is t f f t. I guess I am not really sure if that means that the two predicates are logically equivalent or not. I was actually just playing with truth tables and got this on accident, and wasn't sure if the fact that they both have the same end result is worth noting or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
icantadd said:
Not sure, but I believe that logical equivalence means that two predicates give the same output on the same input.

Correct.

I will take a look at this in the afternoon if other PF'ers haven't got to it before me...its 2.30 in the morning.
 
icantadd said:

Homework Statement



(S \wedge T) \wedge \neg (S \wedge T)

(S \vee T) \Rightarrow (S \wedge T)


Are the two (predicates?) logically equivalent?

Homework Equations



Not sure, but I believe that logical equivalence means that two predicates give the same output on the same input.

The Attempt at a Solution



Worked truth tables. The end result of both where statement T is t t f f and statement S is t f t f, in both cases is t f f t. I guess I am not really sure if that means that the two predicates are logically equivalent or not. I was actually just playing with truth tables and got this on accident, and wasn't sure if the fact that they both have the same end result is worth noting or not.

The way I see it is you just work the logic tables look at all possibilities for (S,T) i.e. (True, True), (True, False), (False, True), (False, False). If that's what you did and got the same result then I would believe they are logically equivalent.
 
icantadd said:

Homework Statement



(S \wedge T) \wedge \neg (S \wedge T)

(S \vee T) \Rightarrow (S \wedge T)


Are the two (predicates?) logically equivalent?

Homework Equations



Not sure, but I believe that logical equivalence means that two predicates give the same output on the same input.
Yes, that is correct. If this is homework, surely you could look that up in your textbook?

The Attempt at a Solution



Worked truth tables. The end result of both where statement T is t t f f and statement S is t f t f, in both cases is t f f t. I guess I am not really sure if that means that the two predicates are logically equivalent or not. I was actually just playing with truth tables and got this on accident, and wasn't sure if the fact that they both have the same end result is worth noting or not.
You just said " logical equivalence means that two predicates give the same output on the same input"
 
First, note that

<br /> (S \wedge T) \wedge \neg (S \wedge T)<br />

will always be false (for every combination of S and T) since (S \wedge T) and \neg (S \wedge T) always have opposite truth values.

However, if both S and T are true, then so is

<br /> (S \vee T) \Rightarrow (S \wedge T) <br />

These two statements are not equivalent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K