Looking for a description of power loss in Latex tubing work in/power out

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inefficiency of latex tubing used in radio-controlled gliders, specifically highlighting power loss during the pulling process. The user reports that a new UV-treated latex tubing exhibits high resistance when pulled, resulting in no significant increase in launch performance compared to a previous brand. The term "hysteresis" is identified as a key factor in explaining the energy storage loss associated with this tubing, indicating that more energy is expended in pulling the tubing than is returned during launch.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hysteresis in materials
  • Knowledge of energy storage concepts
  • Familiarity with radio-controlled glider mechanics
  • Experience with latex tubing properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of hysteresis on rubber materials
  • Explore alternatives to UV-treated latex tubing for improved efficiency
  • Investigate energy storage mechanisms in elastic materials
  • Learn about performance metrics for radio-controlled gliders
USEFUL FOR

Hobbyists and engineers involved in radio-controlled glider design, material scientists studying elastic properties, and anyone seeking to optimize the performance of rubber-based components.

silverdollar1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Looking for a description of low efficiency in Rubber band or Tubing

I am looking for a description of power loss in that you don't get out the work you put into pulling latex tubing.

I have some new latex tubing that is treated with UV protection and is super hard to pull from the very start yet yields no higher launch of my radio controlled glider than another brand. I am trying to explain this wasted energy in pulling it back in energy storage loss. I need words or a paragraph that describe how bad this is other than words "energy storage" that will explain how this brand is not as good as the previous one.

Its more pull to pull it back than it delivers?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the word is hysteresis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
14K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K