Looking for feedback on physics animations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around feedback on short physics animations created by a participant. The focus is on the effectiveness of these animations as teaching aids, including aspects of design, audio elements, and clarity of visual information. Participants share their thoughts on both the artistic and educational aspects of the animations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant appreciates the animations but suggests adding background sounds, music, or narration to enhance engagement.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for silence in visual aids, citing personal taste and past experiences with effective silent presentations.
  • A participant shares their experience with animation tools, mentioning a transition from Adobe Photoshop to Adobe Flash and the associated learning curve.
  • Feedback on the artistic elements includes suggestions to change color schemes for elegance and to adjust line thickness and font size for better readability.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of nodal and antinodal lines in the animations, with specific suggestions for improving their presentation to avoid confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding audio elements in the animations, with some advocating for narration and others preferring silence. There is no consensus on the best approach to visual design, as feedback varies on color choices and clarity of information.

Contextual Notes

Participants' feedback reflects personal preferences and subjective opinions regarding the effectiveness of the animations, which may not apply universally. The discussion highlights the challenges of balancing artistic choices with educational clarity.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in educational technology, animation for teaching, or those seeking to improve their presentation skills in physics and related subjects may find this discussion valuable.

Matt Whibley
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I've recently begun developing short (~1 minute) physics animations and would appreciate any constructive feedback. I'm currently uploading them to my Youtube channel here.

The purpose of these animations is to work alongside existing teaching. They are not designed or equipped to teach entire concepts by themselves. My intention is to use this medium to better illustrate concepts I've struggled to illustrate clearly with just my whiteboard.

I'm still very much learning the ropes of animation, and plan to continue as long as I can find time around my teaching schedule.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

I looked at the first one.They are very well done.

What struck me though was the lack of a speaker reading the text or a music-like background.

Are you planning to add some sort of background sounds, music or narration?

What tools did you use to make them?
 
jedishrfu said:
Welcome to PF!

I looked at the first one.They are very well done.

What struck me though was the lack of a speaker reading the text or a music-like background.

Are you planning to add some sort of background sounds, music or narration?

What tools did you use to make them?

Thanks jedishrfu. Adding narration is something I've been considering. My early thoughts were that it could cause somewhat of a sensory overload (like trying to read something and listen to someone talk at the same time), but I'm thinking this could probably be avoided if it was implemented right. When I get the time, I plan to trial it on some of my existing videos.

I started off using Adobe Photoshop (it has quite a handy timeline animation feature). Upon doing a bit of research however, I discovered Adobe Flash was better suited to what I was looking to achieve. I'm finding that there is quite a bit of a learning curve, but there's also plenty of support and tutorials online.
 
jedishrfu said:
background sounds, music or narration?
Matt Whibley said:
something I've been considering
Matter of "taste." My taste for visual aids runs to silence. Best auto seat-belt encouragement I ever saw was weekly "safety training" film on a projector that had no sound --- didn't have to listen to a lot of "preaching," but was able to watch crash-test dummies flying around in slow-motion with no distractions. That said, the pair I checked looked good, short, sweet, and to the point.
 
My comment here is based on the 'art' part only. And it's more a personal opinion, not a criticism.
Switch from light blue to sepia (and brownish - reddish - orangish elements), it will look much more elegant.
The lines are too thick and/or the font is too small - it looks as if you can strike a better balance.

For the nodal-antinodal animation, while it is clear how the nodal lines are drawn, it does not appear to be so for the antinodal ones. Since they happen to be 'midway' between two subsequent nodal lines, I'd animate it by showing these two lines first (fade-in, fade-out) and then the antinodal one in between them.
Also, there is a point in the animation when the caption says "these are the nodal lines" (or antinodal, I don't remember) but all lines (nodal and antinodal) are shown. Make the other lines fade when the caption is shown.

My two cents.
 
SredniVashtar said:
My comment here is based on the 'art' part only. And it's more a personal opinion, not a criticism.
Switch from light blue to sepia (and brownish - reddish - orangish elements), it will look much more elegant.
The lines are too thick and/or the font is too small - it looks as if you can strike a better balance.

For the nodal-antinodal animation, while it is clear how the nodal lines are drawn, it does not appear to be so for the antinodal ones. Since they happen to be 'midway' between two subsequent nodal lines, I'd animate it by showing these two lines first (fade-in, fade-out) and then the antinodal one in between them.
Also, there is a point in the animation when the caption says "these are the nodal lines" (or antinodal, I don't remember) but all lines (nodal and antinodal) are shown. Make the other lines fade when the caption is shown.

My two cents.

Interesting comment regarding the colour change. I can see how a more reddish colour would be easier on the eyes.

Thanks heaps for the feedback regarding the nodal and antinodal lines video, I can see the room for confusion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K