Looking for information on gamma light sources

AI Thread Summary
Gamma light sources with energies of 10 MeV or higher are typically produced using electron accelerators with tungsten or tantalum targets. The discussion highlights the interest in the Ra226+g-->Ra225+n reaction and its beta minus decay to Ac225, which requires high-energy gamma rays beyond standard reactor capabilities. References to the HIGS facility at TUNL indicate they can achieve significant gamma output above 25 MeV. Commercially available linear accelerators from manufacturers like Varian and Siemens also produce high-energy gammas, relevant for radiation oncology. The conversation emphasizes the need for further research into the effects of high-energy gammas on materials, particularly in relation to corrosion and radiation-induced segregation.
mesa
Gold Member
Messages
694
Reaction score
36
TL;DR Summary
In need of information on high energy and flux gamma light source for nuclear transmutation experiments.
Hello, I am looking for something a bit out of my wheelhouse today, gamma light sources (10 MeV or higher on the max energy threshold).

Does anyone here have experience or more information on these machines? Are they typically electron accelerators utilizing a tungsten or tantalum target? I am guessing we would see a spectrum similar to when measuring high energy Betas during gamma spectroscopy for 'low' energies (considering running a Pb or Bi alloy with a high energy Beta emitter post NAA for tighter measurements next week to get a better look at these spectrums).

I ask becuase I am interested in running the Ra226+g-->Ra225+n reaction and subsequent beta minus decay to Ac225 for comparrison to our reactor method.

This requires a high energy gamma outside of what can typically be made in a reactor or with our accelerator so need to do some some digging. I see the folks at TUNL using the HIGS have an article stating they can hit 10^10g/s above 25MeV; I am assuming the 'g' is for gamma in their writeup.

Either way, any information is appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Such gamma rays are produced with electron linacs.

See - International Workshop on Next Generation Gamma-Ray Source (readily accessible).
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10843

Good set of references and contacts.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes mesa and berkeman
Astronuc said:
Such gamma rays are produced with electron linacs.

See - International Workshop on Next Generation Gamma-Ray Source (readily accessible).
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10843

Good set of references and contacts.
I enjoyed the paper so much I printed a copy for my collection, thank you Astronuc.
 
There are some commercially available LINACs that produce electrons and gammas for radiation oncology. Two major manufacturers are Varian and Siemens.

https://www.oncologysystems.com/res...h-energy-linear-accelerators-comparison-chart
https://www.oncologysystems.com/res.../siemens-linear-accelerators-comparison-chart

Fast neutrons from photoneutron (γ,n) reactions induced by high energy gammas (E > 7 MeV) are a concern in medical oncology.

Secondary neutron spectra from modern Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linacs with multileaf collimators​

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2738742/

Monte Carlo characterizations mapping of the (γ,n) and (n,γ) photonuclear reactions in the high energy X-ray radiation therapy​

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1507136713010031

I'm interested in gammas in the range of 5 to 12 MeV, which are induced by neutron capture in certain nuclides found in structural alloys, the main culprit being Ni-isotopes. There is circumstantial evidence to suggest the presence of high energy gammas influences the chemistry (chemical physics) of alloys with respect to corrosion and radiation-induced segregation.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top